Suppr超能文献

稳态和可变臭氧浓度分布对肺功能的影响。

Effects of steady-state and variable ozone concentration profiles on pulmonary function.

作者信息

Hazucha M J, Folinsbee L J, Seal E

机构信息

Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7310.

出版信息

Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992 Dec;146(6):1487-93. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/146.6.1487.

Abstract

Measurements of ambient ozone (O2) concentration during daylight hours have shown a spectrum of concentration profiles, from a relatively stable to a variable pattern usually reaching a peak level in the early afternoon. Several recent studies have suggested that in estimating exposure dose (O3 concentration [C] x exposure time [T] x ventilation [V]), O3 concentration needs to be weighted more heavily than either ventilation or duration of exposure in the estimates. In this study we tested the hypothesis that regardless of concentration pattern and exposure rate the same exposure dose of O3 will induce the same spirometric response. We exposed 23 healthy male volunteers (20 to 35 yr of age) for 8 h to air, 0.12 ppm O3 (steady-state), and a triangular exposure pattern (concentration increased steadily from zero to 0.24 ppm over the first 4 h and decreased back to zero by 8 h). During the first 30 min of each hour, subjects exercised for 30 min at minute ventilation (VE) approximately 40 L/min. The order of the exposures was randomized, and the exposures were separated by at least 7 days. The response patterns over the 8-h periods for spirometric variables in both O3 exposures were statistically different from air exposure changes and from each other. For FEV1 the p values were 0.017 between air and steady-state profile, 0.002 between air and triangular profile, and 0.037 between steady-state and triangular profiles. Although in the triangular pattern of exposure the maximal O3 concentration was reached at 4 h, the maximum FEV1 decrement (10.2%) was observed at 6 h of exposure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

白天对环境臭氧(O₃)浓度的测量显示出一系列浓度分布,从相对稳定到变化不定的模式,通常在午后早些时候达到峰值水平。最近的几项研究表明,在估算暴露剂量(O₃浓度[C]×暴露时间[T]×通风[V])时,在估算中O₃浓度比通风或暴露持续时间需要给予更大的权重。在本研究中,我们检验了这样一个假设:无论浓度模式和暴露速率如何,相同暴露剂量的O₃都会诱发相同的肺量计反应。我们将23名健康男性志愿者(20至35岁)暴露于空气、0.12 ppm O₃(稳态)和三角形暴露模式(浓度在最初4小时内从零稳步增加到0.24 ppm,并在8小时时降至零)中8小时。在每小时的前30分钟,受试者以约40 L/分钟的分钟通气量(VE)锻炼30分钟。暴露顺序是随机的,且暴露之间至少间隔7天。两种O₃暴露情况下,8小时期间肺量计变量的反应模式在统计学上与空气暴露变化不同,且彼此不同。对于第一秒用力呼气量(FEV₁),空气与稳态分布之间的p值为0.017,空气与三角形分布之间为0.002,稳态与三角形分布之间为0.037。尽管在三角形暴露模式中,O₃最大浓度在4小时时达到,但在暴露6小时时观察到FEV₁最大降幅(10.2%)。(摘要截短于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验