• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下极肾盏结石的处理

Management of lower-pole caliceal stones.

作者信息

Gerber Glenn S

机构信息

Division of Urology, University of Chicago Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60637, USA.

出版信息

J Endourol. 2003 Sep;17(7):501-3. doi: 10.1089/089277903769013676.

DOI:10.1089/089277903769013676
PMID:14565883
Abstract

A series of 205 urologists answered questions about their choice of treatment for lower-caliceal stones. The preferred approaches were extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (SWL) for stones <1 cm and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for those >2 cm. For stones of 1 to 2 cm, 65% preferred SWL and 30% would advise PCNL. Thus, SWL is recommended for lower-caliceal stones more frequently than is justified by published success rates. Continued efforts need to be made to inform practicing urologists regarding the most appropriate therapy for patients with lower-pole stones >1 cm.

摘要

205名泌尿科医生回答了关于他们对下盏结石治疗方法选择的问题。对于小于1厘米的结石,首选的方法是体外冲击波碎石术(SWL);对于大于2厘米的结石,则首选经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)。对于1至2厘米的结石,65%的医生首选SWL,30%的医生建议采用PCNL。因此,对于下盏结石,推荐SWL的频率高于已公布成功率所证明的合理频率。需要继续努力,让执业泌尿科医生了解对于下极结石大于1厘米的患者最合适的治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Management of lower-pole caliceal stones.下极肾盏结石的处理
J Endourol. 2003 Sep;17(7):501-3. doi: 10.1089/089277903769013676.
2
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy for lower pole nephrolithiasis?体外冲击波碎石术还是经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石?
J Endourol. 1996 Feb;10(1):17-20. doi: 10.1089/end.1996.10.17.
3
Nephrolithiasis: "scope," shock or scalpel?肾结石:“范围”、冲击波还是手术刀?
J Endourol. 2005 Jan-Feb;19(1):45-9. doi: 10.1089/end.2005.19.45.
4
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery Versus Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Extracorporeal Shockwave Lithotripsy for Treatment of Lower Pole Renal Stones: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.逆行性肾内手术与经皮肾镜取石术及体外冲击波碎石术治疗下极肾结石的Meta分析和系统评价
J Endourol. 2015 Jul;29(7):745-59. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0799. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
5
A comparison of treatment modalities for renal calculi between 100 and 300 mm2: are shockwave lithotripsy, ureteroscopy, and percutaneous nephrolithotomy equivalent?100 至 300 平方毫米肾结石治疗方式比较:体外冲击波碎石术、输尿管镜碎石术和经皮肾镜取石术等效吗?
J Endourol. 2011 Mar;25(3):481-5. doi: 10.1089/end.2010.0208. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
6
Management of stones associated with intrarenal stenosis: infundibular stenosis and caliceal diverticulum.与肾内狭窄相关的结石的处理:漏斗部狭窄和肾盂憩室。
J Endourol. 2013 Dec;27(12):1546-50. doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0186. Epub 2013 Nov 19.
7
Management of lower pole renal calculi: shock wave lithotripsy versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus flexible ureteroscopy.下极肾结石的治疗:冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术与软性输尿管镜检查术的对比
Urol Res. 2006 Apr;34(2):108-11. doi: 10.1007/s00240-005-0020-6. Epub 2006 Feb 7.
8
Supracostal percutaneous nephrolithotomy for upper pole caliceal calculi.肋上经皮肾镜取石术治疗上极肾盏结石
J Endourol. 1998 Aug;12(4):359-62. doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.359.
9
Lower pole midsize (1-2 cm) calyceal stones: outcome analysis of 56 cases.下极中型(1 - 2厘米)肾盏结石:56例病例的结果分析
Urol Int. 2012;89(3):348-54. doi: 10.1159/000341557. Epub 2012 Aug 22.
10
Comparison of percutaneous nephrolithotomy, shock wave lithotripsy, and retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi 10-20 mm.经皮肾镜取石术、冲击波碎石术和逆行肾内手术治疗10-20毫米下极肾结石的比较
Urol Int. 2013;91(3):345-9. doi: 10.1159/000351136. Epub 2013 Jun 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective study on Comparison of outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones of 1-2 cm size.1-2厘米大小肾结石的微创经皮肾镜取石术与逆行肾内手术疗效比较的前瞻性研究
Urol Ann. 2022 Jul-Sep;14(3):265-272. doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_167_20. Epub 2022 Jul 18.
2
Flexible ureterorenoscopy is associated with less stone recurrence rates over Shockwave lithotripsy in the management of 10-20 millimeter lower pole renal stone: medium follow-up results.输尿管软镜术与体外冲击波碎石术相比,在处理 10-20 毫米下极肾结石方面,结石复发率较低:中期随访结果。
Int Braz J Urol. 2018 Mar-Apr;44(2):314-322. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2017.0483.
3
Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) value changes before and after shock wave lithotripsy.
冲击波碎石术前后中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)值的变化。
Urolithiasis. 2017 Aug;45(4):347-351. doi: 10.1007/s00240-016-0932-3. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
4
Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations.老年人的冲击波碎石术:安全性、有效性及特殊注意事项。
Arab J Urol. 2011 Mar;9(1):29-33. doi: 10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.009. Epub 2011 May 6.
5
Is flexible ureterorenoscopy and laser lithotripsy the new gold standard for lower pole renal stones when compared to shock wave lithotripsy: Comparative outcomes from a University hospital over similar time period.与冲击波碎石术相比,软性输尿管肾镜检查和激光碎石术是否是治疗下极肾结石的新金标准:一所大学医院在相似时间段内的比较结果。
Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(2):183-6. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2015.509. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
6
Effect of renal shock wave lithotripsy on the development of metabolic syndrome in a juvenile swine model: a pilot study.肾冲击波碎石术对幼年猪模型代谢综合征发生发展的影响:一项初步研究。
J Urol. 2015 Apr;193(4):1409-16. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.09.037. Epub 2014 Sep 22.
7
Comparative Study of Lithotripsy and PCNL for 11-15 mm Lower Caliceal Calculi In Community Health Hospital.社区卫生医院中11 - 15毫米下盏结石的体外冲击波碎石术与经皮肾镜取石术的对比研究
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Jun;8(6):HC12-4. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6704.4502. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
8
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of one-shot and telescopic metal dilatation in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a randomized controlled trial.经皮肾镜取石术中单次金属扩张与套叠式金属扩张的安全性和有效性比较:一项随机对照试验
Urolithiasis. 2014 Jun;42(3):269-73. doi: 10.1007/s00240-014-0644-5. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
9
Management of 1-2 cm renal stones.1-2厘米肾结石的管理
Indian J Urol. 2013 Jul;29(3):195-9. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.117280.
10
Retrograde intrarenal surgery for lower pole renal calculi smaller than one centimeter.针对小于1厘米的下极肾结石的逆行性肾内手术
Indian J Urol. 2008 Oct;24(4):544-50. doi: 10.4103/0970-1591.44265.