Müller-Oehring Eva M, Kasten Erich, Poggel Dorothe A, Schulte Tilman, Strasburger Hans, Sabel Bernhard A
Institute of Medical Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, Magdeburg, Germany.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2003 Dec;25(8):1154-68. doi: 10.1076/jcen.25.8.1154.16727.
In patients with posterior-parietal brain damage it is often difficult to decide whether left-sided omissions in perimetry are due to primary visual loss or due to visual neglect. We investigated 11 patients with combined neglect/hemianopia and 11 patients with pure hemianopia using a visual search task with single or double stimulation conditions. The second stimulus was either the fixation point itself (like in perimetry) or a distractor appearing in the hemifield opposite to the target. The fixation point did not worsen left-sided perception, but its disappearance led to a bias of exploration towards the right side in neglect patients but not in pure hemianopics. A distractor in the intact hemifield worsened the performance to left-sided stimuli, that is, neglect patients behaved as if they were completely hemianopic, even in intact parts of the visual field (VF). Three of the neglect patients showed unconscious processing of the distractor in the left VF, suggesting that the visual field defect was produced by neglect mechanisms rather than primary visual loss. This visual search paradigm appears to be helpful in understanding of the nature of hemianopia versus neglect deficits in individual patients.
对于患有顶叶后部脑损伤的患者,往往很难确定视野检查中左侧视野缺损是由于原发性视力丧失还是视觉忽视所致。我们使用单刺激或双刺激条件下的视觉搜索任务,对11例合并忽视/偏盲的患者和11例单纯偏盲的患者进行了研究。第二个刺激要么是注视点本身(如在视野检查中),要么是出现在与目标相对的半视野中的干扰物。注视点并未使左侧感知恶化,但其消失导致忽视患者的探索偏向右侧,而单纯偏盲患者则没有这种情况。完整半视野中的干扰物会使对左侧刺激的表现变差,也就是说,忽视患者的行为就好像他们完全偏盲一样,即使在视野(VF)的完整部分也是如此。3例忽视患者在左侧视野中对干扰物表现出无意识加工,这表明视野缺损是由忽视机制而非原发性视力丧失造成的。这种视觉搜索范式似乎有助于理解个体患者中偏盲与忽视缺陷的本质。