Fraser-Reid Bert, Grimme Stefan, Piacenza Manuel, Mach Mateuz, Schlueter Urs
Natural Products and Glycotechnology Research Institute Inc. (NPG), 4118 Swarthmore Road, Durham, NC 27707, USA.
Chemistry. 2003 Oct 6;9(19):4687-92. doi: 10.1002/chem.200304856.
n-Pentenyl orthoesters (NPOEs) undergo routine acid catalyzed rearrangement into 2-O-acyl n-pentenyl glycosides (NPGs). The reactant and product can both function as glycosyl donors affording 1,2-trans linked glycosides predominantly. However, both donors differ in their rates of reactions, the yields they produce, and the nature of their byproducts, indicating that the NPOE/NPG pair may not be reacting through the same intermediates. We have therefore applied quantum chemical calculations using DFT methods and MP second order perturbation theory to learn more about orthoesters and their 2-O-acyl glycosidic counterparts. The calculations show that in the case of a manno NPG and NPOE pair, each donor goes initially to a different cationic intermediate. Thus, the former goes to a high-energy oxocarbenium ion before descending to a trioxolenium ion in which the charge is distributed over the pyrano ring oxygen, as well as the carbonyl and ether oxygen atoms of the putative C2 ester. On the other hand, ionization of the NPOE produces a dioxolenium ion lying slightly above the more stable trioxolenium counterpart. For the gluco pair, the NPG also goes to a very high-energy oxocarbenium ion, which also descends to a trioxolenium ion. However, unlike the manno analogue, the gluco NPOE does not give a dioxolenium ion; indeed, the dioxolenium is not energetically distinguishable from the trioxolenium counterpart. The theoretical observations have been tested experimentally. Thus, it was found that with manno derivatives, the orthoester is a more reactive donor than the corresponding NPG donor, whereas, for gluco derivatives, there is no advantage to using one over the other, unless one resorts to carefully selected promoters.
正戊烯基原酸酯(NPOEs)在酸催化下会常规重排为2-O-酰基正戊烯基糖苷(NPGs)。反应物和产物都可作为糖基供体,主要生成1,2-反式连接的糖苷。然而,这两种供体在反应速率、产物产率和副产物性质方面存在差异,这表明NPOE/NPG对可能不是通过相同的中间体进行反应。因此,我们应用了密度泛函理论(DFT)方法和MP二阶微扰理论进行量子化学计算,以更深入地了解原酸酯及其2-O-酰基糖苷类似物。计算结果表明,对于甘露糖NPG和NPOE对,每个供体最初会生成不同的阳离子中间体。因此,前者会先形成一个高能的氧鎓离子,然后再降至一个三氧杂环戊烯鎓离子,其中电荷分布在吡喃环氧原子以及假定的C2酯的羰基和醚氧原子上。另一方面,NPOE的电离会产生一个略高于更稳定的三氧杂环戊烯鎓离子对应物的二氧杂环戊烯鎓离子。对于葡萄糖对,NPG也会形成一个非常高能的氧鎓离子,然后也会降至一个三氧杂环戊烯鎓离子。然而,与甘露糖类似物不同的是,葡萄糖NPOE不会产生二氧杂环戊烯鎓离子;实际上,二氧杂环戊烯鎓离子在能量上与三氧杂环戊烯鎓离子对应物没有区别。这些理论观察结果已经通过实验进行了验证。结果发现,对于甘露糖衍生物,原酸酯是比相应的NPG供体更具反应性的供体,而对于葡萄糖衍生物,除非使用精心选择的促进剂,否则使用其中一种并没有优势。