Tashiro Keiichiro, Nagao Taku, Kurose Hitoshi, Ichijo Hidenori, Urushidani Tetsuro
Laboratory of Cell Signaling, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
J Cell Physiol. 2003 Dec;197(3):409-17. doi: 10.1002/jcp.10370.
Rho is known as an important regulator of actin microfilament formation. We were led to study it because a dynamic rearrangement of actin filaments occurs during activation of gastric acid secretion. In order to use specific probes, the rabbit gastric gland culture system was employed and the various genes were expressed using adenovirus vector. When the constitutive active mutant of Rho (RhoAV14) was expressed, histamine- or carbachol-stimulated acid secretion monitored by (14)C-aminopyrine accumulation was inhibited. Conversely, expression of C3 toxin, the specific inhibitor of Rho, and expression of G(12/13)-specific regulator of G-protein signaling domain, the specific inhibitor of G(12/13) which is considered to be an upstream mediator of Rho, both potentiated acid secretion stimulated by the agonists. F-actin staining of parietal cell expressing RhoAV14 revealed that the microfilament supporting the intracellular canaliculi (not on the basolateral membrane) almost disappeared. No clear changes in the intracellular localization of Rho were observed during stimulation of parietal cell. In resting glands, the endogenous active form of Rho was relatively high, and it decreased during histamine stimulation. The finding that any treatment which inhibit Rho augment acid secretion whereas those that activate Rho inhibit secretion strongly suggests that the Rho-pathway conducts a negatively regulating signal in parietal cell activation, possibly via site-specific regulation of actin microfilaments.
Rho被认为是肌动蛋白微丝形成的重要调节因子。我们之所以对其进行研究,是因为在胃酸分泌激活过程中会发生肌动蛋白丝的动态重排。为了使用特异性探针,我们采用了兔胃腺培养系统,并使用腺病毒载体表达各种基因。当表达Rho的组成型活性突变体(RhoAV14)时,通过(14)C-氨基吡啶积累监测的组胺或卡巴胆碱刺激的酸分泌受到抑制。相反,Rho的特异性抑制剂C3毒素的表达以及G(12/13)特异性鸟苷酸结合蛋白信号结构域调节剂的表达(G(12/13)被认为是Rho的上游介质,其特异性抑制剂)均增强了激动剂刺激的酸分泌。对表达RhoAV14的壁细胞进行F-肌动蛋白染色显示,支持细胞内小管的微丝(不在基底外侧膜上)几乎消失。在壁细胞刺激过程中,未观察到Rho在细胞内定位的明显变化。在静息腺体中,Rho的内源性活性形式相对较高,而在组胺刺激过程中其活性降低。抑制Rho的任何处理都会增加酸分泌,而激活Rho的处理则会抑制分泌,这一发现强烈表明,Rho途径可能通过对肌动蛋白微丝的位点特异性调节,在壁细胞激活中传导负调节信号。