Siddiqui Athar Habib, Ahmad Masood
Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Life Sciences, AMU, Aligarh 202002, UP, India.
Mutat Res. 2003 Nov 10;541(1-2):21-9. doi: 10.1016/s1383-5718(03)00176-1.
The genotoxicity of three water bodies, viz. industrial waste water of Aligarh city, ground water pumped out from the industrial area of Aligarh, and river water of Yamuna, downstream of Agra, was carried out by means of Ames plate incorporation test and the Ames fluctuation test. All the test samples were significantly mutagenic in both the testing systems. The ground water and river water samples were subjected to XAD concentration prior to the mutagenicity/genotoxicity testing, while the industrial waste water was used directly. Whereas TA98, TA102 and TA104 strains have been found to be maximally sensitive in the Ames plate incorporation assay conducted for various water samples, TA98 and TA100 strains were the most responsive strains in the Ames fluctuation test. The apparent disparity in the sensitivity patterns of various Ames strains by plate incorporation and fluctuation assays could be attributed to a large extent to the different conventional ways of interpretation of the data in these systems.
通过艾姆斯平板掺入试验和艾姆斯波动试验,对三个水体的遗传毒性进行了研究,这三个水体分别是阿里格尔市的工业废水、从阿里格尔工业区抽取的地下水以及阿格拉下游亚穆纳河的河水。在这两种测试系统中,所有测试样品均具有显著的致突变性。在进行致突变性/遗传毒性测试之前,对地下水和河水样品进行了XAD浓缩,而工业废水则直接使用。在对各种水样进行的艾姆斯平板掺入试验中,发现TA98、TA102和TA104菌株最为敏感,而在艾姆斯波动试验中,TA98和TA100菌株是反应最灵敏的菌株。平板掺入试验和波动试验中各种艾姆斯菌株敏感性模式的明显差异在很大程度上可归因于这些系统中数据解释的不同传统方式。