Song Allen W, Harshbarger Todd, Li Tianlu, Kim Keun-Ho, Ugurbil Kamil, Mori Susumu, Kim Dae-Shik
Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Neuroimage. 2003 Oct;20(2):955-61. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00292-1.
Recent studies suggested that functional activation using apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) contrast can be used to detect synchronized functional MRI (fMRI) signal changes during brain activation. Such changes may reflect better spatial localization to the smaller vessels, which are closely coupled to the true neuronal activation. Since it is generally believed that there are neural pathways among neuronally relevant areas, methods that would allow clear delineation of such pathways could help validate the neuronal relevance of the activated functional areas. The development of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has shown promise in detailed nerve fiber tracking. In this report, DTI was adopted to track the fiber connections among the discrete areas determined using the ADC contrast, in an effort to confirm the neuronal origin of these activated areas. As a comparison, activated areas using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast were also obtained. Our results showed that the areas determined by the ADC contrast consistently allowed better fiber tracking within, while the BOLD-activated areas were more spatially diffused due to the smearing effect of brain vasculature, rendering the task of fiber tracking more difficult. This observation provides converging evidence that the activated areas using ADC contrast are more closely coupled to the neuronal activity than those using BOLD contrast.
最近的研究表明,使用表观扩散系数(ADC)对比的功能激活可用于检测大脑激活期间同步的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)信号变化。这种变化可能更好地反映对较小血管的空间定位,这些小血管与真正的神经元激活密切相关。由于人们普遍认为在神经元相关区域之间存在神经通路,能够清晰描绘此类通路的方法有助于验证激活的功能区域的神经元相关性。扩散张量成像(DTI)的发展在详细的神经纤维追踪方面显示出前景。在本报告中,采用DTI追踪使用ADC对比确定的离散区域之间的纤维连接,以确认这些激活区域的神经元起源。作为比较,还获得了使用血氧水平依赖(BOLD)对比的激活区域。我们的结果表明,由ADC对比确定的区域始终能在内部实现更好的纤维追踪,而由于脑血管系统的模糊效应,BOLD激活区域在空间上扩散得更多,使得纤维追踪任务更加困难。这一观察结果提供了趋同的证据,即使用ADC对比的激活区域比使用BOLD对比的激活区域与神经元活动的耦合更紧密。