Williams P T
Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, Donner Laboratory, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA.
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Jan;28(1):120-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802480.
While the benefits of vigorous exercise on body weight and regional adiposity are well established, whether these benefits affect equally the highest and lowest portions of the weight distribution have not been previously reported. The impact of exercise on the more extreme body weights and body circumferences is clinically important because these values represent individuals at greatest health risk.
Self-reported weights and body circumferences from a cross-sectional sample of 7288 male and 2326 female runners were divided into five strata, according to the distances run per week and within each stratum the 5th, 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th and 95th percentiles were determined. Least-squares regression was then employed at each percentile to determine the dose-response relationship between running distance and adiposity as determined by body mass index (BMI) and self-reported circumferences of the waist, hip and chest.
Per kilometer run per week, the associated decline for BMI was three-fold greater at the 95th than at the 5th percentile in men, and six-fold greater at the 95th than the 5th percentile in women (all P<0.001). Reported waist circumference also declined more sharply at the 95th percentile than at the 5th percentile in men (-0.13 +/- 0.02 vs -0.06 +/- 0.01 cm per km/week) and women (-0.18 +/- 0.04 vs -0.05 +/- 0.01 cm per km/week). In women, both hip and chest circumferences declined more sharply per kilometer run at the 95th percentile than at the 5th percentile.
These results are consistent with the hypothesis that running promotes the greatest weight loss specifically in those individuals who have the most to gain from losing weight. Comparisons based on average BMI or average body circumferences are likely to underestimate the health benefits of running because of the J-shaped relationship between adiposity and mortality. Whether the observed cross-sectional associations are primarily due to exercise-induced weight loss or self-selection remains to be determined.
尽管剧烈运动对体重和局部肥胖的益处已得到充分证实,但此前尚无报道这些益处是否对体重分布的最高和最低部分产生同等影响。运动对更极端体重和身体周长的影响在临床上很重要,因为这些数值代表了健康风险最大的个体。
对7288名男性和2326名女性跑步者的横断面样本中自我报告的体重和身体周长,根据每周跑步距离分为五个层次,并在每个层次中确定第5、10、25、50、75、90和95百分位数。然后在每个百分位数处采用最小二乘法回归,以确定跑步距离与肥胖之间的剂量反应关系,肥胖由体重指数(BMI)以及自我报告的腰围、臀围和胸围来确定。
每周每跑一公里,男性中第95百分位数处BMI的相关下降幅度比第5百分位数处大三倍,女性中第95百分位数处比第5百分位数处大六倍(所有P<0.001)。报告的腰围在男性(-0.13±0.02对-0.06±0.01厘米/公里/周)和女性(-0.18±0.04对-0.05±0.01厘米/公里/周)中第95百分位数处也比第5百分位数处下降得更急剧。在女性中,第95百分位数处每跑一公里,臀围和胸围下降都比第5百分位数处更急剧。
这些结果与以下假设一致,即跑步能促进最大程度的体重减轻,特别是在那些最能从减肥中获益的个体中。由于肥胖与死亡率之间呈J形关系,基于平均BMI或平均身体周长的比较可能会低估跑步对健康的益处。观察到的横断面关联主要是由于运动引起的体重减轻还是自我选择,仍有待确定。