• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

环形黏膜切除术联合吻合器直肠固定术是治疗老年有症状脱垂性痔的一种安全、有效的门诊替代治疗方法。

Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy is a safe, effective outpatient alternative for the treatment of symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids in the elderly.

作者信息

Johnson D B, DiSiena M R, Fanelli R D

机构信息

Residency Program in General Surgery, Berkshire Medical Center, 725 North Street, Pittsfield, MA 01201, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1990-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8151-8. Epub 2003 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-003-8151-8
PMID:14569447
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy (CMSP) was first introduced in 1993 as a less painful and highly effective alternative to traditional operative hemorrhoidectomy. Although CMSP has many advantages over traditional hemorrhoidectomy, some authorities and insurers continue to regard it as an inpatient procedure and others have been slow to adopt this progressive technique. This study documents the safe and effective outpatient nature of this procedure.

METHODS

From December 2001 through August 2002, 33 patients with mucosal prolapse and prolapsing internal hemorrhoids were treated using circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy as outpatients at an ambulatory surgery center. Fourteen (42%) patients were treated using local anesthesia with intravenous sedation, 18 (55%) chose spinal anesthesia, and general anesthesia was used in one patient. Patients were evaluated postoperatively by telephone at 1 and 2 weeks, and seen in clinic at 4 weeks.

RESULTS

One patient (3%) required an emergency department visit for minor postoperative bleeding. None of our elderly patients required emergency department evaluation and none reported significant complications. Four patients (13%) required urinary catheter placement prior to discharge from the surgery center due to urinary retention. One patient (3%) developed an uncomplicated urinary tract infection, which resolved with antibiotic treatment. Two patients were seen earlier than 4 weeks at the surgeon's request; one was immunocompromised from chemotherapy for metastatic carcinoid, and one reported persistent pain during initial telephone follow-up. No complications were identified in either patient, and no additional complications have been noted to date.

CONCLUSIONS

CMSP is a safe, effective, time-efficient procedure for patients with mucosal prolapse and prolapsing hemorrhoids that can be performed safely in the ambulatory surgery center setting. Age is not a limiting factor in selecting patients for this safe outpatient procedure.

摘要

背景

1993年首次引入吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(CMSP),作为传统手术痔切除术疼痛较轻且高效的替代方法。尽管CMSP相较于传统痔切除术有诸多优势,但一些权威人士和保险公司仍将其视为住院手术,而其他一些人则迟迟未采用这种先进技术。本研究记录了该手术安全有效的门诊性质。

方法

2001年12月至2002年8月,33例黏膜脱垂和内痔脱垂患者在门诊手术中心接受吻合器痔上黏膜环切术治疗。14例(42%)患者采用局部麻醉加静脉镇静,18例(55%)选择脊髓麻醉,1例患者使用全身麻醉。术后通过电话在1周和2周时对患者进行评估,并在4周时进行门诊复查。

结果

1例患者(3%)因术后轻微出血需到急诊科就诊。我们的老年患者均无需到急诊科评估,也无人报告有严重并发症。4例患者(13%)因尿潴留于手术中心出院前需要留置导尿管。1例患者(3%)发生了无并发症的尿路感染,经抗生素治疗后痊愈。2例患者应外科医生要求在4周前就诊;1例因转移性类癌化疗导致免疫功能低下,另1例在最初电话随访时报告持续疼痛。这2例患者均未发现并发症,且迄今为止未发现其他并发症。

结论

对于黏膜脱垂和内痔脱垂患者,CMSP是一种安全、有效、省时的手术,可在门诊手术中心安全进行。年龄不是选择患者进行这种安全门诊手术的限制因素。

相似文献

1
Circumferential mucosectomy with stapled proctopexy is a safe, effective outpatient alternative for the treatment of symptomatic prolapsing hemorrhoids in the elderly.环形黏膜切除术联合吻合器直肠固定术是治疗老年有症状脱垂性痔的一种安全、有效的门诊替代治疗方法。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1990-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-8151-8. Epub 2003 Oct 23.
2
Stapled hemorrhoidectomy with local anesthesia can be performed safely and cost-efficiently.局部麻醉下吻合器痔切除术可安全且经济高效地进行。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2004 Jul;47(7):1164-9. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0550-y. Epub 2004 May 19.
3
Stapled rectal mucosectomy vs. closed hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, clinical trial.吻合器直肠黏膜切除术与闭合式痔切除术:一项随机临床试验。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Oct;45(10):1367-74; discussion 1374-5. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-6426-3.
4
Stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a review of our early experience.
Am Surg. 2003 Oct;69(10):862-5.
5
[Milligam-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy and stapled mucoprolapsectomy. Clinical comparison of the results].[Milligam-摩根痔切除术与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术。结果的临床比较]
G Chir. 2005 Jun-Jul;26(6-7):267-74.
6
Initial experience with stapled anoplasty in the operative management of prolapsing hemorrhoids and mucosal rectal prolapse.吻合器肛门成形术治疗内痔脱垂和直肠黏膜脱垂的初步经验。
Am J Surg. 2002 May;183(5):519-24. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(02)00842-5.
7
Day case stapled anopexy for the treatment of haemorrhoids and rectal mucosal prolapse.日间手术吻合器痔上黏膜环切钉合术治疗痔和直肠黏膜脱垂。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Jun;14(6):765-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02751.x.
8
Simple harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy utilizing local anesthesia combined with intravenous sedation: a safe and rapid alternative to conventional hemorrhoidectomy.采用局部麻醉联合静脉镇静的简易谐波手术刀痔切除术:一种安全快速的传统痔切除术替代方法。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;22(7):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0242-2. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
9
Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.环形黏膜切除术(吻合器痔切除术)与传统痔切除术:随机对照试验
Lancet. 2000 Mar 4;355(9206):779-81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06122-x.
10
Long-term outcome of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) versus stapled hemorrhoidopexys (STH) for grade III-IV hemorrhoids: preliminary results.吻合器经肛门直肠切除术(STARR)与吻合器痔上黏膜环切术(STH)治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ度痔的长期疗效:初步结果
In Vivo. 2014 Nov-Dec;28(6):1171-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulatory haemorrhoidal surgery: systematic literature review and qualitative analysis.门诊痔手术:系统文献综述与定性分析
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Apr;30(4):437-45. doi: 10.1007/s00384-014-2073-x. Epub 2014 Nov 28.
2
Massive prolapsed haemorrhoids managed by ablation and correction in a poor resourced area.在资源匮乏地区通过消融和矫正治疗巨大脱垂性痔。
J Surg Case Rep. 2013 Nov 4;2013(11):rjt094. doi: 10.1093/jscr/rjt094.
3
Pelvic sepsis after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.吻合器痔上黏膜环切术术后盆腔感染

本文引用的文献

1
Modern stapled Longo procedure vs. conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized controlled trial.现代吻合器Longo手术与传统Milligan-Morgan痔切除术的随机对照试验
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2002 Jan;17(1):50-3. doi: 10.1007/s003840100342.
2
Stapled vs excision hemorrhoidectomy: long-term results of a prospective randomized trial.吻合器痔切除术与切除性痔切除术:一项前瞻性随机试验的长期结果
Arch Surg. 2002 Mar;137(3):337-40. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.3.337.
3
Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.
World J Gastroenterol. 2008 Oct 14;14(38):5924-6. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5924.
4
Circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy: experience of a single center with 445 cases.环形吻合器痔上黏膜环切术:单中心445例经验
World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1783-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9627-4. Epub 2008 Jun 14.
吻合器痔上黏膜环切术与Milligan-Morgan痔切除术的随机临床试验
Br J Surg. 2001 Aug;88(8):1049-53. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01830.x.
4
Day surgery for mucosal-hemorrhoidal prolapse using a circular stapler and modified regional anesthesia.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Jun;44(6):842-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02234705.
5
Stapled hemorrhoidectomy--cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.吻合器痔切除术——成本与效果。一项随机对照试验,包括长达三个月的大便失禁评分、肛门直肠测压和肛管超声评估。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Dec;43(12):1666-75. doi: 10.1007/BF02236847.
6
Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.
Lancet. 2000 Mar 4;355(9206):810. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02208-X.
7
Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.环形黏膜切除术(吻合器痔切除术)与传统痔切除术:随机对照试验
Lancet. 2000 Mar 4;355(9206):779-81. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)06122-x.
8
Limited hemorrhoidectomy: results and long-term follow-up.局限性痔切除术:结果与长期随访
Dis Colon Rectum. 1999 Jul;42(7):909-14; discussion 914-5. doi: 10.1007/BF02237100.