Haveran Liam A, Sturrock Paul R, Sun Mark Y, McDade Janet, Singla Sudershan, Paterson Craig A, Counihan Timothy C
Section of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, MA 01655, USA.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2007 Jul;22(7):801-6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-006-0242-2. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
Harmonic Scalpel(R) hemorrhoidectomy (HSH) is an established surgical therapy for the treatment of symptomatic grade III and IV hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoid surgery is still being performed as an inpatient procedure with general or regional anesthesia in many centers today. There was a trend toward performing hemorrhoid surgery as an ambulatory procedure using local anesthesia supplemented with intravenous sedation. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of HSH performed with combination local anesthesia and intravenous sedation in an ambulatory surgical center.
A retrospective review was performed on the clinical charts of all patients undergoing HSH in an ambulatory surgical center from 2001 to 2005. All hemorrhoidectomies were attempted under propofol/ketamine intravenous sedation and local anesthesia in the prone position. A simple, open technique without routine suture was used.
During the study period, 180 patients (70 females) underwent HSM. Mean procedure and total operating room time were 12 and 28 min, respectively. One patient (0.6%) was converted to general endotracheal anesthesia. Ten patients (5.6%) required post anesthesia care unit (PACU) observation. All patients were discharged home after the procedure. Postoperative complications occurred in 19 patients (10.6%). There were no reoperations and the total readmission rate was 3.7%.
HSH performed with a combination of intravenous sedation and local anesthesia is safe and effective in the ambulatory surgery setting. The combined technique was associated with a rate of complications comparable to published series utilizing conventional hemorrhoidectomy techniques. Added benefits include shorter hospital stay and a potential for cost savings.
超声刀痔切除术(HSH)是治疗有症状的Ⅲ度和Ⅳ度痔疮的一种成熟的外科治疗方法。如今在许多中心,痔疮手术仍作为住院手术,采用全身麻醉或区域麻醉。有一种趋势是将痔疮手术作为门诊手术,采用局部麻醉并辅以静脉镇静。本研究的目的是评估在门诊手术中心采用局部麻醉与静脉镇静联合进行HSH的安全性和有效性。
对2001年至2005年在一家门诊手术中心接受HSH的所有患者的临床病历进行回顾性分析。所有痔切除术均在丙泊酚/氯胺酮静脉镇静和局部麻醉下,患者取俯卧位时进行。采用一种简单的开放技术,不进行常规缝合。
在研究期间,180例患者(70例女性)接受了HSM。平均手术时间和总手术室时间分别为12分钟和28分钟。1例患者(0.6%)转为全身气管内麻醉。10例患者(5.6%)需要在麻醉后护理单元(PACU)观察。所有患者术后均出院回家。19例患者(10.6%)发生术后并发症。无再次手术,总再入院率为3.7%。
在门诊手术环境中,静脉镇静与局部麻醉联合进行HSH是安全有效的。该联合技术的并发症发生率与采用传统痔切除技术的已发表系列报道相当。额外的好处包括缩短住院时间和潜在的成本节约。