Suppr超能文献

密歇根州的睡眠呼吸障碍:一项实践模式调查。

Sleep-disordered breathing in Michigan: a practice pattern survey.

作者信息

Chervin Ronald D, Moyer Cheryl A, Palmisano John, Avidan Alon Y, Robinson Emerson, Garetz Susan L, Helman Joseph I

机构信息

Sleep Disorders Center, Department of Neurology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Sleep Breath. 2003 Sep;7(3):95-104. doi: 10.1007/s11325-003-0095-7.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This survey sought to determine whether self-professed sleep specialists in the State of Michigan show practice variations in the diagnosis and management of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB), and whether such variations occur between pulmonologists and neurologists.

METHODS

Questionnaires on practice volume and patterns during the prior 12 months were mailed to physician members of the Michigan Sleep Disorders Association ( n = 119); 67 were completed and returned.

RESULTS

Respondents reported that they personally saw a median of 8 new patients each week for suspected SDB; estimates were that 86% of these patients were eventually confirmed to have SDB. Most patients (82%) had laboratory-based polysomnography after an initial clinic evaluation, and most (69%) of those treated for SDB received continuous positive airway pressure. However, practice patterns differed substantially among respondents, even when the analysis was limited to the 42 who reported board certification by the American Board of Sleep Medicine. For example, among all surveyed practices the likelihood that suspected SDB would be evaluated with a split-night diagnostic and treatment polysomnogram varied from 0 to 90%. The likelihood of SDB treatment with bilevel positive airway pressure varied from 0 to 50%, with automatically titrating devices from 0 to 100%, with surgery from 0 to 100% (0 to 50% among certified practitioners), and with oral appliances from 0 to 20%. The practice patterns of pulmonologists and neurologists did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSION

Approaches to SDB vary widely in Michigan, though not according to clinician background in pulmonary medicine or neurology. A patient's experience, in both assessment and treatment, could differ substantially based on which clinician is consulted.

摘要

目的

本调查旨在确定密歇根州自称的睡眠专家在睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)的诊断和管理方面是否存在实践差异,以及这种差异是否在肺科医生和神经科医生之间出现。

方法

关于前12个月实践量和模式的问卷被邮寄给密歇根睡眠障碍协会的医生成员(n = 119);67份问卷被填写并返回。

结果

受访者报告称,他们每周亲自接待疑似SDB的新患者中位数为8名;估计这些患者中有86%最终被确诊患有SDB。大多数患者(82%)在初次门诊评估后进行了基于实验室的多导睡眠图检查,并且大多数接受SDB治疗的患者(69%)接受了持续气道正压通气治疗。然而,即使分析仅限于42名报告获得美国睡眠医学委员会认证的受访者,受访者之间的实践模式仍存在很大差异。例如,在所有接受调查的实践中,疑似SDB通过分夜诊断和治疗多导睡眠图进行评估的可能性从0到90%不等。使用双水平气道正压通气治疗SDB的可能性从0到50%不等,使用自动调压设备的可能性从0到100%不等,使用手术治疗的可能性从0到100%(在获得认证的从业者中为0到50%),使用口腔矫治器的可能性从0到20%不等。肺科医生和神经科医生的实践模式没有显著差异。

结论

在密歇根州,SDB的治疗方法差异很大,尽管与肺科或神经科的临床医生背景无关。根据咨询的临床医生不同,患者在评估和治疗中的体验可能会有很大差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验