Streiff M B, Dundes L, Spivak J L
Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
J Clin Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;54(4):430-2. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00277-8.
Mailed surveys are a popular means of obtaining data on large populations. In July 1999 a mail survey was conducted among 3000 randomly selected members of the American Society of Hematology to assess their approach to diagnosis and treatment of polycythemia vera. Because the researchers and the study population are members of the same professional organization with a vested interest in the results, we anticipated that the advantages of return stamped postage seen in previous studies would be less significant. The response rate for stamped return envelopes was 38% versus 32% for business reply envelopes. This statistically significant difference (P =.0005) of six percentage points is comparable to previous research. Excluding labor, the total cost per returned survey was $2.62 for business reply envelopes versus $1.82 for stamped return envelopes. We conclude that stamped return envelopes are a more effective and cost-efficient means of procuring data from physician specialists.
邮寄调查问卷是获取大量人群数据的常用方式。1999年7月,我们对随机抽取的3000名美国血液学会成员进行了一项邮寄调查,以评估他们对真性红细胞增多症的诊断和治疗方法。由于研究人员和研究对象都是同一个对研究结果有既得利益的专业组织的成员,我们预计之前研究中看到的预付邮资回邮信封的优势将不那么显著。预付邮资回邮信封的回复率为38%,而商业回邮信封的回复率为32%。这六个百分点的统计学显著差异(P = 0.0005)与之前的研究相当。排除人工成本,每份回收调查问卷的总成本,商业回邮信封为2.62美元,而预付邮资回邮信封为1.82美元。我们得出结论,预付邮资回邮信封是从专科医生那里获取数据的更有效且更具成本效益的方式。