Suppr超能文献

犬腹腔镜卵巢切除术中单极与双极电凝术:一项非随机、前瞻性临床试验

Monopolar versus bipolar electrocoagulation in canine laparoscopic ovariectomy: a nonrandomized, prospective, clinical trial.

作者信息

Van Goethem Bart E B J, Rosenveldt Karin W, Kirpensteijn Jolle

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences of Companion Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Vet Surg. 2003 Sep-Oct;32(5):464-70. doi: 10.1053/jvet.2003.50052.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of using monopolar (MEC) or bipolar electrocoagulation (BEC) on surgical time for laparoscopic ovariectomy in dogs and to evaluate the influence of age, weight and obesity, and estrus or pseudopregnancy on surgical time.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, nonrandomized, clinical trial.

ANIMALS

One hundred three female dogs.

METHODS

Laparoscopic ovariectomy was performed with MEC or BEC by 1 surgeon using a standard protocol. Surgical time was recorded for the different procedural stages and was statistically evaluated for differences between MEC and BEC (chi(2), Student t test, and ANOVA). The influence of significant variables was analyzed using multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean surgical time was 47 minutes (range, 27 to 110 minutes). With BEC, surgical time was significantly shorter (41 minutes; P <.001) than with MEC (53 minutes). Obesity (56 vs. 42 minutes; P <.001) and intraoperative mesovarial bleeding (56 vs. 46 minutes; P =.03) increased surgical time. Dog age, estrus, and pseudopregnancy did not significantly influence surgical time.

CONCLUSIONS

BEC decreased laparoscopic ovariectomy time, decreased intraoperative hemorrhage, and, with the technique used, facilitated exteriorization of the ovaries.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Laparoscopic ovariectomy can be performed more rapidly when using BEC instead of MEC and with less risk of mesovarial hemorrhage.

摘要

目的

比较单极电凝(MEC)或双极电凝(BEC)对犬腹腔镜卵巢切除术手术时间的影响,并评估年龄、体重、肥胖以及发情期或假孕对手术时间的影响。

研究设计

前瞻性、非随机临床试验。

动物

103只雌性犬。

方法

由1名外科医生采用标准方案,使用MEC或BEC进行腹腔镜卵巢切除术。记录不同手术阶段的手术时间,并对MEC和BEC之间的差异进行统计学评估(卡方检验、学生t检验和方差分析)。使用多元线性回归分析来分析显著变量的影响。

结果

平均手术时间为47分钟(范围为27至110分钟)。使用BEC时,手术时间(41分钟)显著短于使用MEC时(53分钟;P <.001)。肥胖(56分钟对42分钟;P <.001)和术中卵巢系膜出血(56分钟对46分钟;P =.03)会增加手术时间。犬的年龄、发情期和假孕对手术时间没有显著影响。

结论

BEC缩短了腹腔镜卵巢切除术的时间,减少了术中出血,并且在使用该技术时便于卵巢的取出。

临床意义

使用BEC而非MEC进行腹腔镜卵巢切除术可更快完成,且卵巢系膜出血风险更低。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验