Suppr超能文献

文拉法辛缓释剂与阿米替林缓释剂治疗中度重度抑郁症患者的疗效和安全性比较

Efficacy and safety of venlafaxine ER vs. amitriptyline ER in patients with major depression of moderate severity.

作者信息

Sauer Heinrich, Huppertz-Helmhold Sabine, Dierkes Wilfried

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Pharmacopsychiatry. 2003 Sep;36(5):169-75. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-43052.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A double-blind, randomized phase-III study was conducted with the aim to compare the efficacy and safety of venlafaxine ER (extended release) with that of amitriptyline ER in moderately depressed outpatients.

METHODS

Patients with major depression of moderate severity, HAM-D (Hamilton Depression scale, 21 items) score 20-26, were given a six-week double-blind treatment with venlafaxine ER and amitriptyline ER in a dosis of 75 mg each, which could be increased to 150 mg, if necessary. Efficacy was assessed using HAM-D and CGI (clinical global impression) scores. Safety analysis was carried out using the HAM-D item 3 to assess suicidality, the d2 test to evaluate attention and drug screening for benzodiazepines. Adverse events were recorded at each visit.

RESULTS

160 patients were randomized. There were 151 patients available for analysis in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population. The according-to-protocol (ATP) population consisted of 117 patients, with 60 patients in the venlafaxine ER group and 57 in the amitriptyline ER (extended release) group. The non-inferiority of venlafaxine ER compared to amitriptyline ER with reference to the primary efficacy parameter, the change of HAM-D total score, could be proven in both the ITT population and the ATP population. There were no significant differences between groups in the HAM-D response rates and the CGI scores of items 1 (severity) and 2 (improvement). Venlafaxine ER showed a more favorable safety profile than amitriptyline ER: adverse drug reactions were less frequent under venlafaxine ER than under amitriptyline ER. Most of the discontinuations in the amitriptyline ER group were due to dry mouth. The d2 test showed greater improvement of performance under venlafaxine ER.

DISCUSSION

In this study with patients treated for major depression of moderate severity, the non-inferiority of venlafaxine ER compared to amitriptyline ER with respect to the chosen efficacy parameter could be demonstrated. Venlafaxine ER showed a more favorable safety profile than amitriptyline ER.

摘要

引言

开展了一项双盲、随机III期研究,旨在比较缓释文拉法辛与缓释阿米替林在中度抑郁门诊患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

中度严重程度的重度抑郁症患者,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D,21项)评分20 - 26,接受为期六周的双盲治疗,分别给予缓释文拉法辛和缓释阿米替林,剂量均为75毫克,必要时可增至150毫克。使用HAM-D和临床总体印象量表(CGI)评分评估疗效。使用HAM-D第3项评估自杀倾向、用d2测试评估注意力以及进行苯二氮䓬类药物筛查以进行安全性分析。每次访视时记录不良事件。

结果

160例患者被随机分组。意向性治疗(ITT)人群中有151例患者可进行分析。符合方案(ATP)人群由117例患者组成,其中缓释文拉法辛组60例,缓释阿米替林组57例。在ITT人群和ATP人群中均证实,相对于主要疗效参数HAM-D总分的变化,缓释文拉法辛不劣于缓释阿米替林。两组在HAM-D缓解率以及第1项(严重程度)和第2项(改善情况)的CGI评分方面无显著差异。缓释文拉法辛的安全性优于缓释阿米替林:缓释文拉法辛组的药物不良反应比缓释阿米替林组更少。缓释阿米替林组的大多数停药是由于口干。d2测试显示缓释文拉法辛治疗下的表现改善更明显。

讨论

在这项针对中度严重程度的重度抑郁症患者的研究中,相对于选定的疗效参数,证实了缓释文拉法辛不劣于缓释阿米替林。缓释文拉法辛的安全性优于缓释阿米替林。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验