Dumont Lionel, Lysakowski Christopher, Tramèr Martin R, Junod Jean-Daniel, Mardirosoff Chahé, Tassonyi Edömer, Kayser Bengt
Neuroanaesthesia Unit, Division of Anaesthesiology, Department of Anaesthesiology, Pharmacology and Surgical Intensive Care, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.
Clin Sci (Lond). 2004 Mar;106(3):269-77. doi: 10.1042/CS20030187.
Magnesium is a physiological N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist. The NMDA receptor may be involved in the pathogenesis of acute mountain sickness (AMS). In the present study, healthy subjects were randomized to receive either 400 mg of oral magnesium citrate (16 mmol) or matching placebo every 8 h for 5 days (prevention trial). Subjects then climbed to 4559 m in approx. 24 h and stayed there for 48 h. A Lake Louise Score <3 at any time was defined as the absence of AMS, whereas a score >6 (with ataxia, headache and nausea) was defined as a prevention failure. In a subsequent trial (treatment trial), subjects with a Lake Louise Score >6 (with ataxia, headache and/or nausea) were randomized to receive either 4 g of intravenous magnesium sulphate (16 mmol) or matching placebo. A decrease in the score >50% within 60 min was regarded as a treatment success. Dichotomous data were analysed using relative risk (RR) or odds ratio (OR), and continuous data using Student's t test or Wilcoxon's rank-sum test. In the prevention trial, data from 61 subjects (30 receiving magnesium and 31 placebo) were analysed. With oral magnesium, 20% of subjects had no AMS compared with 16.1% in the placebo group [RR (95% CI), 1.2 (0.4-3.6); where CI is confidence interval]. With magnesium, 40% were prevention failures compared with 35.5% in the placebo group [RR (95% CI), 1.13 (0.59-2.15)]. The mean time to failure and severity of AMS was similar between the two groups. With magnesium, 38.2% had loose stools compared with 11.8% in placebo group [RR (95% CI), 3.25 (1.18-8.97)]. In the treatment trial, 12 subjects received magnesium and 13 received the placebo. With intravenous magnesium, 25% were regarded as treatment successes compared with none in the placebo group [OR (95% CI), 9.71 (0.91-103.4)]. With magnesium, mean (+/- S.D.) scores decreased from 11.6 +/- 1.7 before treatment to 9.0 +/- 3.5 after treatment (P=0.009); scores remained unchanged in the placebo group. With magnesium, 75% of subjects experienced a transient flushing compared with 7.7% in the placebo group [RR (95% CI), 0.05 (0.01-0.25)]. In conclusion, oral magnesium does not prevent AMS. In subjects with established AMS, intravenous magnesium reduces the severity of symptoms to some extent, but this effect is of no clinical importance.
镁是一种生理性N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)拮抗剂。NMDA受体可能参与急性高原病(AMS)的发病机制。在本研究中,健康受试者被随机分组,每8小时口服400mg柠檬酸镁(16mmol)或匹配的安慰剂,共5天(预防试验)。然后受试者在约24小时内攀升至4559米,并在那里停留48小时。任何时间的路易斯湖评分<3被定义为无AMS,而评分>6(伴有共济失调、头痛和恶心)被定义为预防失败。在随后的试验(治疗试验)中,路易斯湖评分>6(伴有共济失调、头痛和/或恶心)的受试者被随机分组,接受4g静脉注射硫酸镁(16mmol)或匹配的安慰剂。60分钟内评分降低>50%被视为治疗成功。二分数据使用相对风险(RR)或比值比(OR)进行分析,连续数据使用学生t检验或威尔科克森秩和检验进行分析。在预防试验中,分析了61名受试者的数据(30名接受镁治疗,31名接受安慰剂)。口服镁时,20%的受试者无AMS,而安慰剂组为16.1%[RR(95%CI),1.2(0.4-3.6);其中CI为置信区间]。使用镁时,40%为预防失败,而安慰剂组为35.5%[RR(95%CI),1.13(0.59-2.15)]。两组之间AMS失败的平均时间和严重程度相似。使用镁时,38.2%的受试者有腹泻,而安慰剂组为11.8%[RR(95%CI),3.25(1.18-8.97)]。在治疗试验中,12名受试者接受镁治疗,13名接受安慰剂。静脉注射镁时,25%被视为治疗成功,而安慰剂组无一例成功[OR(95%CI),9.71(0.91-103.4)]。使用镁时,平均(±标准差)评分从治疗前的11.6±1.7降至治疗后的9.0±3.5(P=0.009);安慰剂组评分保持不变。使用镁时,75%的受试者出现短暂潮红,而安慰剂组为7.7%[RR(95%CI),0.05(0.01-0.25)]。总之,口服镁不能预防AMS。在已确诊的AMS患者中,静脉注射镁在一定程度上降低了症状的严重程度,但这种效果在临床上并不重要。