Suppr超能文献

银杏叶和乙酰唑胺预防急性高原病:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验。

Ginkgo biloba and acetazolamide prophylaxis for acute mountain sickness: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Chow Tony, Browne Vaughn, Heileson Heather L, Wallace Desiree, Anholm James, Green Steven M

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center and Children's Hospital, Loma Linda, CA 92354, USA.

出版信息

Arch Intern Med. 2005 Feb 14;165(3):296-301. doi: 10.1001/archinte.165.3.296.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Acute mountain sickness (AMS) commonly occurs when unacclimatized individuals ascend to altitudes above 2000 m. Acetazolamide and Ginkgo biloba have both been recommended for AMS prophylaxis; however, there is conflicting evidence regarding the efficacy of Ginkgo biloba use. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of acetazolamide vs Ginkgo biloba for AMS prophylaxis.

METHODS

We randomized unacclimatized adults to receive acetazolamide, Ginkgo biloba, or placebo in double-blind fashion and took them to an elevation of 3800 m for 24 hours. We graded AMS symptoms using the Lake Louise Acute Mountain Sickness Scoring System (LLS) and compared the incidence of AMS (defined as LLS score > or =3 and headache).

RESULTS

Fifty-seven subjects completed the trial (20 received acetazolamide; 17, Ginkgo biloba, and 20, placebo). The LLS scores were significantly different between groups; the median score of the acetazolamide group was significantly lower than that of the placebo group (P=.01; effect size, 2; and 95% confidence interval [CI], 0 to 3), unlike that of the Ginkgo biloba group (P=.89; effect size, 0; and 95% CI, -2 to 2). Acute mountain sickness occurred less frequently in the acetazolamide group than in the placebo group (effect size, 30%; 95% CI, 61% to -15%), and the frequency of occurrence was similar between the Ginkgo biloba group and the placebo group (effect size, -5%; 95% CI, -37% to 28%).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, prophylactic acetazolamide therapy decreased the symptoms of AMS and trended toward reducing its incidence. We found no evidence of similar efficacy for Ginkgo biloba.

摘要

背景

急性高原病(AMS)通常发生在未适应环境的个体攀升至海拔2000米以上时。乙酰唑胺和银杏叶都被推荐用于预防急性高原病;然而,关于使用银杏叶的疗效存在相互矛盾的证据。我们进行了一项关于乙酰唑胺与银杏叶预防急性高原病的随机、安慰剂对照试验。

方法

我们将未适应环境的成年人随机分为三组,以双盲方式分别给予乙酰唑胺、银杏叶或安慰剂,然后将他们带至海拔3800米处停留24小时。我们使用路易斯湖急性高原病评分系统(LLS)对急性高原病症状进行分级,并比较急性高原病的发生率(定义为LLS评分≥3且伴有头痛)。

结果

57名受试者完成了试验(20人接受乙酰唑胺;17人接受银杏叶;20人接受安慰剂)。各组之间的LLS评分存在显著差异;乙酰唑胺组的中位数评分显著低于安慰剂组(P = 0.01;效应量为2;95%置信区间[CI]为0至3),而银杏叶组则不然(P = 0.89;效应量为0;95% CI为 -2至2)。乙酰唑胺组急性高原病的发生率低于安慰剂组(效应量为30%;95% CI为61%至 -15%),银杏叶组与安慰剂组的发生率相似(效应量为 -5%;95% CI为 -37%至28%)。

结论

在本研究中,预防性使用乙酰唑胺疗法可减轻急性高原病症状,并呈降低其发生率的趋势。我们未发现银杏叶有类似疗效的证据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验