Lan Ruiting, Stevenson Gordon, Reeves Peter R
School of Molecular and Microbial Biosciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Infect Immun. 2003 Nov;71(11):6298-306. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.11.6298-6306.2003.
All Shigella and enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) strains carry a 230-kb virulence plasmid (pINV) which is essential for their invasiveness. There are two sequence forms, pINV A and pINV B, of the plasmid (R. Lan, B. Lumb, D. Ryan, and P. R. Reeves, Infect. Immun. 69:6303-6309, 2001), and the recently sequenced pINV plasmid from Shigella flexneri serotype 5 is a pINV B form. In this study we sequenced the majority of the coding region of the pINV A form from S. flexneri serotype 6 other than insertion sequence or related sequences and compared it with the pINV B form. More than half of the genes sequenced appear to be under positive selection based on their low ratio of synonymous to nonsynonymous substitutions. This high proportion of selected differences indicates that the two pINV forms have functional differences, and comparative studies of pathogenicity in different Shigella-EIEC strains could be informative. There are also genes absent in the S. flexneri serotype 6 plasmid, including the sepA gene encoding serine protease, the major secreted protein of S. flexneri serotype 2a, and the stbAB genes, which encode one of the two partition systems found in S. flexneri serotype 5. The incompatibility of the two pINV forms appears to be due to either small differences in the mvpAT postsegregational killing system or the presence of an unknown system in pINVA.
所有志贺氏菌和肠侵袭性大肠杆菌(EIEC)菌株都携带一个230 kb的毒力质粒(pINV),该质粒对它们的侵袭性至关重要。该质粒有两种序列形式,即pINV A和pINV B(R. Lan、B. Lumb、D. Ryan和P. R. Reeves,《感染与免疫》69:6303 - 6309,2001年),最近测序的福氏志贺氏菌5型的pINV质粒是pINV B形式。在本研究中,我们对福氏志贺氏菌6型pINV A形式除插入序列或相关序列外的大部分编码区域进行了测序,并将其与pINV B形式进行比较。根据同义替换与非同义替换的低比率,超过一半的测序基因似乎受到正选择。这种高比例的选择差异表明这两种pINV形式存在功能差异,对不同志贺氏菌 - EIEC菌株致病性的比较研究可能会提供有价值的信息。福氏志贺氏菌6型质粒中还存在一些缺失的基因,包括编码丝氨酸蛋白酶的sepA基因,福氏志贺氏菌2a型的主要分泌蛋白,以及stbAB基因,它们编码福氏志贺氏菌5型中发现的两种分配系统之一。这两种pINV形式的不相容性似乎是由于mvpAT后分离杀伤系统的微小差异或pINVA中存在未知系统。