• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替米沙坦与氯沙坦对印度轻至中度高血压患者疗效、安全性及耐受性的比较:一项初步研究

Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of telmisartan with losartan in Indian patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a pilot study.

作者信息

Samra S S, Dongre Neelesh, Ballary Chetna, Desai Anish

机构信息

Department of Cardiac and Vascular Services, St George's Hospitals, Mumbai.

出版信息

J Indian Med Assoc. 2003 May;101(5):327-8.

PMID:14575232
Abstract

A prospective, randomised, double-blind, parallel group study was carried out to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of telmisartan 40 mg once daily with losartan 50 mg once daily in Indian patients with mild to moderate hypertension. It had a placebo run-in period of 2 weeks followed by drug treatment (telmisartan 40 mg, once daily or losartan 50 mg once daily) for 8 weeks. Supine BP was assessed at the end of every 2 weeks. Tolerability and safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory parameters and evaluation of adverse events. Treatment with telmisartan resulted in a significant reduction of SBP of 10.3% and 13.7% as compared to 6.6% and 10.6% in losartan group at the end of 6th and 8th weeks respectively. At the end of 6th and 8th weeks, the reduction was 14.3% and 18.1% among telmisartan which was significantly more as compared to 8.8% and 14.3% in losartan group respectively. The laboratory values were within normal limits. Both drugs were well tolerated. Telmisartan monotherapy in a dose of 40 mg once daily has a clinically better therapeutic effect as compared to losartan 50 mg and a good tolerability profile in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

摘要

一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组研究开展,以比较在印度轻至中度高血压患者中,每日一次服用40毫克替米沙坦与每日一次服用50毫克氯沙坦的疗效、安全性和耐受性。该研究有2周的安慰剂导入期,随后进行为期8周的药物治疗(每日一次服用40毫克替米沙坦或每日一次服用50毫克氯沙坦)。每2周结束时评估仰卧位血压。通过体格检查、实验室参数和不良事件评估来评估耐受性和安全性。与氯沙坦组在第6周和第8周结束时分别降低6.6%和10.6%相比,替米沙坦治疗导致收缩压分别显著降低10.3%和13.7%。在第6周和第8周结束时,替米沙坦组的降低幅度分别为14.3%和18.1%,与氯沙坦组的8.8%和14.3%相比显著更大。实验室值在正常范围内。两种药物耐受性良好。与50毫克氯沙坦相比,每日一次服用40毫克替米沙坦单药治疗在轻至中度高血压患者中具有临床上更好的治疗效果和良好的耐受性。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of telmisartan with losartan in Indian patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a pilot study.替米沙坦与氯沙坦对印度轻至中度高血压患者疗效、安全性及耐受性的比较:一项初步研究
J Indian Med Assoc. 2003 May;101(5):327-8.
2
Assessment of efficacy, safety and tolerability of fixed dose combination of telmisartan 40mg and hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg in adult Indian patients with mild to moderate hypertension.评估替米沙坦40mg与氢氯噻嗪12.5mg固定剂量复方制剂在轻度至中度高血压成年印度患者中的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
J Indian Med Assoc. 2004 Sep;102(9):525-7.
3
Dose response and safety of telmisartan in patients with mild to moderate hypertension.替米沙坦治疗轻至中度高血压患者的剂量反应及安全性
J Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Dec;40(12 Pt 1):1380-90.
4
Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus HCTZ compared with losartan plus HCTZ in patients with essential hypertension.与氯沙坦加氢氯噻嗪相比,替米沙坦加氢氯噻嗪固定剂量组合治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效和耐受性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2003 May;57(4):273-9.
5
Telmisartan vs losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension--a randomised ABPM study.替米沙坦与氯沙坦加氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度原发性高血压——一项随机动态血压监测研究
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Aug;17(8):569-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001592.
6
Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing telmisartan with losartan in the treatment of patients with hypertension.比较替米沙坦与氯沙坦治疗高血压患者的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Hypertens. 2008 May;21(5):546-52. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.30. Epub 2008 Mar 20.
7
ABPM comparison of the antihypertensive profiles of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists telmisartan and losartan in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.替米沙坦与氯沙坦这两种选择性血管紧张素II受体拮抗剂在轻至中度高血压患者中的降压效果的动态血压监测比较
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Oct;13(10):657-64. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000925.
8
A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan 40-80 mg vs. losartan 50-100 mg in Taiwanese hypertensive patients.替米沙坦40 - 80毫克与氯沙坦50 - 100毫克对台湾高血压患者疗效及耐受性的双盲比较
Int J Clin Pract Suppl. 2004 Dec(145):40-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2004.00409.x.
9
Results of a comparative, phase III, 12-week, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind assessment of the efficacy and tolerability of a fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and amlodipine versus amlodipine monotherapy in Indian adults with stage II hypertension.替米沙坦与氨氯地平固定剂量复方制剂对比氨氯地平单药治疗对印度II期高血压成年患者疗效及耐受性的多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、III期、12周对照评估结果
Clin Ther. 2007 Dec;29(12):2667-76. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.12.017.
10
Reduction (TELMAR) as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension--a prospective, randomised, double-blind comparison of telmisartan with metoprolol over a period of six months rationale and study design.通过磁共振成像评估轻度至中度高血压患者的血压降低情况(TELMAR)——替米沙坦与美托洛尔在六个月期间的前瞻性、随机、双盲比较:原理与研究设计
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2003 Dec;4(4):234-43. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2003.038.

引用本文的文献

1
RSSDI Guidelines for the management of hypertension in patients with diabetes mellitus.印度糖尿病学会(RSSDI)糖尿病患者高血压管理指南
Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries. 2022 Oct;42(4):576-605. doi: 10.1007/s13410-022-01143-7. Epub 2022 Dec 15.
2
Efficacy and Tolerability of Olmesartan, Telmisartan, and Losartan in Patients of Stage I Hypertension: A Randomized, Open-label Study.奥美沙坦、替米沙坦和氯沙坦治疗Ⅰ期高血压患者的疗效与耐受性:一项随机、开放标签研究
J Pharmacol Pharmacother. 2017 Jul-Sep;8(3):106-111. doi: 10.4103/jpp.JPP_39_17.
3
Substitutes of Prescription Medicines - A Review of Concerns Relevant to Doctors and Patients.
处方药替代品——与医生和患者相关的问题综述
J Clin Diagn Res. 2017 Aug;11(8):FE01-FE05. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2017/28552.10439. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
4
Effects of oral fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus ramipril and losartan plus ramipril in hypertension: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase iii trial in adult indian patients.替米沙坦联合雷米普利及氯沙坦联合雷米普利口服固定剂量复方制剂治疗高血压的效果:一项针对成年印度患者的多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、III期试验。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2005 Nov;66(6):630-42. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.12.007.
5
Comparison of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists in the treatment of essential hypertension.血管紧张素II 1型受体拮抗剂治疗原发性高血压的比较。
Drugs. 2008;68(9):1207-25. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200868090-00003.
6
Updated meta-analytical approach to the efficacy of antihypertensive drugs in reducing blood pressure.抗高血压药物降低血压疗效的更新荟萃分析方法
Clin Drug Investig. 2007;27(11):735-53. doi: 10.2165/00044011-200727110-00001.