• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替米沙坦与氯沙坦加氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度原发性高血压——一项随机动态血压监测研究

Telmisartan vs losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension--a randomised ABPM study.

作者信息

Neutel J M, Kolloch R E, Plouin P F, Meinicke T W, Schumacher H

机构信息

Orange County Heart Institute & Research Center, Orange, CA 92868, USA.

出版信息

J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Aug;17(8):569-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001592.

DOI:10.1038/sj.jhh.1001592
PMID:12874615
Abstract

The objective of this prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-end point parallel-group, multicentre study was to show that telmisartan 80 mg is not inferior to a fixed-dose combination of losartan 50 mg/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 12.5 mg in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. The criterion for noninferiority was a treatment difference of < or =3.0 mmHg in the reduction of 24-h mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from the end of the 4-week placebo washout period to the end of the 6-week active treatment period. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the mean reduction in 24-h DBP was 8.3+/-6.7 mmHg among telmisartan-treated patients (n=332) and 10.3+/-6.3 mmHg among losartan/HCTZ-treated patients (n=350). The mean adjusted difference in 24-h DBP between the two treatment groups was 1.9 mmHg, allowing rejection of the a priori null hypothesis of a treatment difference of >3 mmHg. The reduction in mean 24-h systolic blood pressure was 13.2+/-10.2 mmHg with telmisartan and 17.1+/-10.3 mmHg with losartan/HCTZ. Both drugs provided effective control over the 24-h dosing interval. Analyses of morning (0600-1159) ambulatory blood pressure monitoring DBP means and trough cuff DBP confirmed the noninferiority hypothesis of the protocol for telmisartan 80 mg vs losartan 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg. The reductions in office blood pressures measured at trough in patients treated with telmisartan were -16.3/-9.6 and -18.5/-11.1 mmHg in the patients treated with losartan/HCTZ (difference -2.4/-1.2 mmHg). There were no differences between the side-effect profiles of the two treatments.

摘要

这项前瞻性、随机、开放标签、终点设盲的平行组多中心研究的目的是证明,对于轻至中度高血压患者,80毫克替米沙坦在降低24小时平均动态舒张压(DBP)方面不劣于50毫克氯沙坦/12.5毫克氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)的固定剂量组合。非劣效性标准是从4周安慰剂洗脱期结束到6周积极治疗期结束时,24小时平均动态舒张压降低的治疗差异≤3.0毫米汞柱。在意向性分析中,替米沙坦治疗组(n = 332)患者24小时DBP的平均降低值为8.3±6.7毫米汞柱,氯沙坦/HCTZ治疗组(n = 350)患者为10.3±6.3毫米汞柱。两个治疗组之间24小时DBP的平均校正差异为1.9毫米汞柱,从而可以拒绝治疗差异>3毫米汞柱的先验无效假设。替米沙坦治疗时24小时平均收缩压降低13.2±10.2毫米汞柱,氯沙坦/HCTZ治疗时为17.1±10.3毫米汞柱。两种药物在24小时给药间隔内均能有效控制血压。对早晨(06:00 - 11:59)动态血压监测DBP均值和谷值袖带DBP的分析证实了80毫克替米沙坦对比50毫克氯沙坦/12.5毫克HCTZ方案的非劣效性假设。替米沙坦治疗患者在谷值时测量的诊室血压降低值为-16.3 / -9.6毫米汞柱,氯沙坦/HCTZ治疗患者为-18.5 / -11.1毫米汞柱(差异为-2.4 / -1.2毫米汞柱)。两种治疗的副作用谱无差异。

相似文献

1
Telmisartan vs losartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of mild-to-moderate essential hypertension--a randomised ABPM study.替米沙坦与氯沙坦加氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度原发性高血压——一项随机动态血压监测研究
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Aug;17(8):569-75. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001592.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus HCTZ compared with losartan plus HCTZ in patients with essential hypertension.与氯沙坦加氢氯噻嗪相比,替米沙坦加氢氯噻嗪固定剂量组合治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效和耐受性。
Int J Clin Pract. 2003 May;57(4):273-9.
3
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.
4
Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in comparison with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide in managing patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压患者的比较。
Hypertens Res. 2005 Jul;28(7):555-63. doi: 10.1291/hypres.28.555.
5
Effect of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide vs lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide combination on ambulatory blood pressure and cognitive function in elderly hypertensive patients.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与赖诺普利/氢氯噻嗪联合用药对老年高血压患者动态血压及认知功能的影响
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Mar;20(3):177-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001964.
6
Combination treatment with telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide in black patients with mild to moderate hypertension.替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪联合治疗黑人轻至中度高血压患者。
Clin Cardiol. 2001 Jan;24(1):66-72. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960240111.
7
Long-term efficacy and tolerability of telmisartan as monotherapy and in combination with other antihypertensive medications.替米沙坦单药治疗及与其他抗高血压药物联合使用的长期疗效和耐受性。
Blood Press. 2002;11(5):302-9. doi: 10.1080/080370502320779511.
8
Telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide versus telmisartan or hydrochlorothiazide monotherapy in patients with mild to moderate hypertension: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial.替米沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与替米沙坦或氢氯噻嗪单药治疗轻至中度高血压患者:一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组试验。
Clin Ther. 2001 Jun;23(6):833-50. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80072-2.
9
Ambulatory monitoring of systolic hypertension in the elderly: Eprosartan/hydrochlorothiazide compared with losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (INSIST trial).老年人动态收缩期高血压监测:依普罗沙坦/氢氯噻嗪与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪的比较(INSIST 试验)。
Adv Ther. 2010 Jun;27(6):365-80. doi: 10.1007/s12325-010-0032-7. Epub 2010 Jun 16.
10
A prospective, randomized, open-label trial comparing telmisartan 80 mg with valsartan 80 mg in patients with mild to moderate hypertension using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.一项前瞻性、随机、开放标签试验,采用动态血压监测比较替米沙坦80毫克与缬沙坦80毫克治疗轻度至中度高血压患者的疗效。
Can J Cardiol. 2000 Sep;16(9):1123-32.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for nocturnal blood pressure reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管紧张素受体阻滞剂降低夜间血压的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2362880. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2362880. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
2
comparative effectiveness research collaboration and precision medicine.比较效果研究协作与精准医学
Ann Neurosci. 2015 Jul;22(3):127-9. doi: 10.5214/ans.0972.7531.220301.
3
Effects of oral fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan plus ramipril and losartan plus ramipril in hypertension: A multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, phase iii trial in adult indian patients.
替米沙坦联合雷米普利及氯沙坦联合雷米普利口服固定剂量复方制剂治疗高血压的效果:一项针对成年印度患者的多中心、前瞻性、随机、双盲、III期试验。
Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2005 Nov;66(6):630-42. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.12.007.
4
Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis.通过动态血压监测评估血管紧张素受体阻滞剂作为单一疗法的降压疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2014 Jul;35(26):1732-42. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht333. Epub 2013 Aug 21.
5
Is the fixed-dose combination of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide a good approach to treat hypertension?替米沙坦与氢氯噻嗪的固定剂量复方制剂是治疗高血压的好方法吗?
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2007;3(3):265-78.
6
Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan vs valsartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once daily for the treatment of hypertension.血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂替米沙坦与缬沙坦联合每日一次服用25毫克氢氯噻嗪治疗高血压的效果比较
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2006 Sep;8(9):626-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05411.x.
7
Targeting effective blood pressure control with angiotensin receptor blockers.使用血管紧张素受体阻滞剂实现有效的血压控制。
Int J Clin Pract. 2006 Mar;60(3):315-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1368-5031.2006.00784.x.
8
Telmisartan: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.替米沙坦:其在高血压管理中的应用综述
Drugs. 2006;66(1):51-83. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200666010-00004.
9
A chronotherapeutic approach to effective blood pressure management.一种有效管理血压的时间治疗方法。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2002 Jul-Aug;4(4 Suppl 1):15-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2002.01035.x.