Buckwalter J A, Martin J A, Olmstead M, Athanasiou K A, Rosenwasser M P, Mow V C
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA.
Iowa Orthop J. 2003;23:66-74.
The risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis following an intra-articular fracture is determined to large extent by the success or failure of osteochondral repair. To measure the efficacy of osteochondral repair in a primate and determine if osteochondral repair differs in the patella (PA) and the medial femoral condyle (FC) and if passive motion treatment affects osteochondral repair, we created 3.2 mm diameter 4.0 mm deep osteochondral defects of the articular surfaces of the PA and FC in both knees of twelve skeletally mature cynomolgus monkeys. Defects were treated with intermittent passive motion (IPM) or cast-immobilization (CI) for two weeks, followed by six weeks of ad libitum cage activity. We measured restoration of the articular surface, and the volume, composition, type II collagen concentration and in situ material properties of the repair tissue. The osteochondral repair response restored a mean of 56% of the FC and 34% of the PA articular surfaces and filled a mean of 68% of the chondral and 92% of the osseous defect volumes respectively. FC defect repair produced higher concentrations of hyaline cartilage (FC 83% vs. PA 52% in chondral defects and FC 26% vs. PA 14% in osseous defects) and type II collagen (FC 84% vs. PA 71% in chondral defects and FC 37% vs. PA 9% in osseous defects) than PA repair. IPM did not increase the volume of chondral or osseous repair tissue in PA or FC defects. In both PA and FC defects, IPM stimulated slightly greater expression of type II collagen in chondral repair tissue (IPM 81% vs. CI 74%); and, produced a higher concentration of hyaline repair tissue (IPM 62% vs. CI 42%), but IPM produced poorer restoration of PA articular surfaces (IPM 23% vs. CI 45%). Normal articular cartilage was stiffer, and had a larger Poisson's ratio and less permeability than repair cartilage. Overall Cl treated repair tissue was stiffer and less permeable than IPM treated repair tissue. The stiffness, Poisson's ratio and permeability of femoral condyle cast immobilized (FC CI) treated repair tissue most closely approached the normal values. The differences in osteochondral repair between FC and PA articular surfaces suggest that the mechanical environment strongly influences the quality of articular surface repair. Decreasing the risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis following intra-articular fractures will depend on finding methods of promoting the osteochondral repair response including modifying the intra-articular biological and mechanical environments.
关节内骨折后创伤性骨关节炎的风险在很大程度上取决于骨软骨修复的成败。为了测量灵长类动物骨软骨修复的效果,并确定髌骨(PA)和股骨内侧髁(FC)的骨软骨修复是否存在差异,以及被动运动治疗是否会影响骨软骨修复,我们在12只骨骼成熟的食蟹猴的双膝关节的PA和FC关节表面制造了直径3.2毫米、深4.0毫米的骨软骨缺损。缺损处采用间歇性被动运动(IPM)或石膏固定(CI)治疗两周,随后六周自由活动于笼中。我们测量了关节表面的恢复情况,以及修复组织的体积、组成、II型胶原蛋白浓度和原位材料特性。骨软骨修复反应平均恢复了FC关节表面的56%和PA关节表面的34%,分别填充了软骨缺损的68%和骨缺损的92%。FC缺损修复产生的透明软骨浓度(软骨缺损中FC为83%,PA为52%;骨缺损中FC为26%,PA为14%)和II型胶原蛋白浓度(软骨缺损中FC为84%,PA为71%;骨缺损中FC为37%,PA为9%)均高于PA修复。IPM并未增加PA或FC缺损处软骨或骨修复组织的体积。在PA和FC缺损中,IPM均刺激软骨修复组织中II型胶原蛋白的表达略有增加(IPM为81%,CI为74%);并且,产生的透明修复组织浓度更高(IPM为62%,CI为42%),但IPM对PA关节表面的修复效果较差(IPM为23%,CI为45%)。正常关节软骨比修复软骨更硬,泊松比更大,渗透性更小。总体而言,CI治疗的修复组织比IPM治疗的修复组织更硬,渗透性更小。股骨髁石膏固定(FC CI)治疗的修复组织的硬度、泊松比和渗透性最接近正常值。FC和PA关节表面骨软骨修复的差异表明,机械环境强烈影响关节表面修复的质量。降低关节内骨折后创伤性骨关节炎的风险将取决于找到促进骨软骨修复反应的方法,包括改变关节内的生物学和机械环境。