Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 10;13(4):e0195261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195261. eCollection 2018.
Bone-to-bone integration can be obtained by osteoconductive ceramics such as hydroxyapatite (HAp) and beta-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), but cartilage-to-cartilage integration is notoriously difficult. Many cartilage repair therapies, including microfracture and mosaicplasty, capitalize on the reparative aspects of subchondral bone due to its resident population of stem cells and vascularity. A strategy of incorporating tissue engineered neocartilage into a ceramic to form an osteochondral construct may serve as a suitable alternative to achieve cartilage graft fixation. The use of a tissue engineered osteochondral construct to repair cartilage defects may also benefit from the ceramic's proximity to underlying bone and abundant supply of progenitor cells and nutrients. The objective of the first study was to compare HAp and β-TCP ceramics, two widely used ceramics in bone regeneration, in terms of their ability to influence neocartilage interdigitation at an engineered osteochondral interface. Additional assays quantified ceramic pore size, porosity, and compressive strength. The compressive strength of HAp was six times higher than that of β-TCP due to differences in porosity and pore size, and HAp was thus carried forward in the second study as the composition with which to engineer an osteochondral construct. Importantly, it was shown that incorporation of the HAp ceramic in conjunction with the self-assembling process resulted in functionally viable neocartilage. For example, only collagen/dry weight and ultimate tensile strength of the chondral control constructs remained significantly greater than the neocartilage cut off the osteochondral constructs. By demonstrating that the functional properties of engineered neocartilage are not negatively affected by the inclusion of an HAp ceramic in culture, neocartilage engineering strategies may be directly applied to the formation of an osteochondral construct.
骨整合可以通过骨传导陶瓷如羟基磷灰石(HAp)和β-磷酸三钙(β-TCP)获得,但软骨整合却非常困难。许多软骨修复疗法,包括微骨折和马赛克plasty,都利用了软骨下骨的修复特性,因为它含有干细胞和血管。将组织工程化的新软骨整合到陶瓷中形成骨软骨构建体的策略可能是实现软骨移植物固定的一种合适替代方法。使用组织工程化的骨软骨构建体修复软骨缺损也可能受益于陶瓷与下面骨骼的接近以及丰富的祖细胞和营养物质供应。第一项研究的目的是比较 HAp 和β-TCP 陶瓷,这两种在骨再生中广泛使用的陶瓷,以评估它们在工程化骨软骨界面影响新软骨交织的能力。额外的测定量化了陶瓷的孔径、孔隙率和抗压强度。由于孔隙率和孔径的差异,HAp 的抗压强度是β-TCP 的六倍,因此在第二项研究中,HAp 被推进作为构建骨软骨构建体的组成部分。重要的是,研究表明,与自组装过程结合使用 HAp 陶瓷会导致功能上可行的新软骨。例如,只有软骨/干重和软骨对照构建体的极限拉伸强度仍然显著大于从骨软骨构建体上剪下的新软骨。通过证明在培养过程中包含 HAp 陶瓷不会对工程化新软骨的功能特性产生负面影响,新软骨工程化策略可能直接应用于骨软骨构建体的形成。