Henke Michael, Laszig Roland, Rübe Christian, Schäfer Ulrich, Haase Klaus-Dieter, Schilcher Burkhard, Mose Stephan, Beer Karl T, Burger Ulrich, Dougherty Chris, Frommhold Hermann
Abteilung Strahlenheilkunde der Radiologischen Universitätsklinik, Hugstetter Strasse 55, D-79106, Freiburg, Germany.
Lancet. 2003 Oct 18;362(9392):1255-60. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14567-9.
Anaemia is associated with poor cancer control, particularly in patients undergoing radiotherapy. We investigated whether anaemia correction with epoetin beta could improve outcome of curative radiotherapy among patients with head and neck cancer.
We did a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial in 351 patients (haemoglobin <120 g/L in women or <130 g/L in men) with carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Patients received curative radiotherapy at 60 Gy for completely (R0) and histologically incomplete (R1) resected disease, or 70 Gy for macroscopically incompletely resected (R2) advanced disease (T3, T4, or nodal involvement) or for primary definitive treatment. All patients were assigned to subcutaneous placebo (n=171) or epoetin beta 300 IU/kg (n=180) three times weekly, from 10-14 days before and continuing throughout radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was locoregional progression-free survival. We assessed also time to locoregional progression and survival. Analysis was by intention to treat.
148 (82%) patients given epoetin beta achieved haemoglobin concentrations higher than 140 g/L (women) or 150 g/L (men) compared with 26 (15%) given placebo. However, locoregional progression-free survival was poorer with epoetin beta than with placebo (adjusted relative risk 1.62 [95% CI 1.22-2.14]; p=0.0008). For locoregional progression the relative risk was 1.69 (1.16-2.47, p=0.007) and for survival was 1.39 (1.05-1.84, p=0.02).
Epoetin beta corrects anaemia but does not improve cancer control or survival. Disease control might even be impaired. Patients receiving curative cancer treatment and given erythropoietin should be studied in carefully controlled trials.
贫血与癌症控制不佳相关,尤其是在接受放疗的患者中。我们研究了使用β-促红细胞生成素纠正贫血是否能改善头颈癌患者根治性放疗的疗效。
我们对351例口腔、口咽、下咽或喉癌患者(女性血红蛋白<120 g/L或男性血红蛋白<130 g/L)进行了一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验。对于完全(R0)切除和组织学切除不完全(R1)的疾病,患者接受60 Gy的根治性放疗;对于宏观切除不完全(R2)的晚期疾病(T3、T4或淋巴结受累)或原发性确定性治疗,患者接受70 Gy的放疗。所有患者从放疗前10 - 14天开始,每周皮下注射三次安慰剂(n = 171)或300 IU/kg的β-促红细胞生成素(n = 180),持续至整个放疗过程。主要终点是局部区域无进展生存期。我们还评估了局部区域进展时间和生存期。分析采用意向性治疗。
与接受安慰剂的26例(15%)患者相比,148例(82%)接受β-促红细胞生成素的患者血红蛋白浓度高于140 g/L(女性)或150 g/L(男性)。然而,β-促红细胞生成素组的局部区域无进展生存期比安慰剂组更差(调整后的相对风险1.62 [95% CI 1.22 - 2.14];p = 0.0008)。对于局部区域进展,相对风险为1.69(1.16 - 2.47,p = 0.007),对于生存期,相对风险为1.39(1.05 - 1.84,p = 0.02)。
β-促红细胞生成素可纠正贫血,但不能改善癌症控制或生存期。疾病控制甚至可能受到损害。对于接受根治性癌症治疗并使用促红细胞生成素的患者,应在严格控制的试验中进行研究。