Papagiannopoulou P, Argiriadou H, Georgiou M, Papaziogas B, Sfyra E, Kanakoudis F
Department of Anesthesiology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, G. Gennimatas Hospital, Ethnikis Aminis 41, 546 35 Thessaloniki, Greece.
Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1961-4. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9256-1. Epub 2003 Oct 28.
Postoperative pain is less intense after laparoscopic surgery than after open surgery. However, patients may gain additional benefit from a preincisional local infiltration of anesthetic. The aim of this study was to compare the analgesic efficacy of two local anesthetics, ropivacaine and levobupivacaine, for tissue infiltration as a means of improving postoperative pain control after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Using a randomized, double-blind study design, 57 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I and II patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly assigned to receive local infiltration with 0.9% saline solution (Placebo group, n = 18), ropivacaine 1% (Rop group, n = 20), or levobupivacaine 0.5% (Lev group, n = 19). The local anesthetic was administered, prior to trocar placement, using the same technique and delivering the same volume (20 ml) for all three groups. The anesthetic technique was standardized for all groups. Postoperative pain was rated at 2 h, 4 h, and 24 h postoperatively by visual analogue scale (VAS) score. Cumulative analgesic consumption and adverse effects were also recorded. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by a post hoc test.
The Lev and Rop groups did not differ significantly in their VAS scores at 2 h postoperatively, but the Lev group experienced significantly ( p < 0.001) less pain than the Placebo and Rop groups at 4 h and 24 h postoperatively. The Rop group registered significantly lower VAS scores ( p < 0.001) than the Placebo group at 4 h postoperatively. Additionally, the consumption of analgesics was significantly lower in the Lev group than in the Rop ( p < 0.01) and Placebo ( p < 0.001) groups, and patients in the Rop group consumed significantly less analgesics ( p < 0.001) than the to patients in the Placebo group.
Local tissue infiltration with levobupivacaine is more effective than ropivacaine in reducing the postoperative pain associated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
腹腔镜手术后的疼痛强度低于开放手术后的疼痛强度。然而,患者可能会从切口前局部浸润麻醉中获得额外益处。本研究的目的是比较两种局部麻醉药罗哌卡因和左旋布比卡因用于组织浸润对改善腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛控制的镇痛效果。
采用随机、双盲研究设计,将57例计划行腹腔镜胆囊切除术的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)Ⅰ级和Ⅱ级患者随机分为三组,分别接受0.9%生理盐水局部浸润(安慰剂组,n = 18)、1%罗哌卡因局部浸润(罗哌组,n = 20)或0.5%左旋布比卡因局部浸润(左旋组,n = 19)。在放置套管针前,采用相同技术为三组患者注射相同体积(20 ml)的局部麻醉药。所有组的麻醉技术均标准化。术后2小时、4小时和24小时采用视觉模拟评分(VAS)对术后疼痛进行评分。记录累积镇痛药物消耗量和不良反应。采用方差分析(ANOVA)进行数据分析,随后进行事后检验。
左旋组和罗哌组术后2小时的VAS评分无显著差异,但左旋组在术后4小时和24小时的疼痛明显低于安慰剂组和罗哌组(p < 0.001)。罗哌组术后4小时的VAS评分显著低于安慰剂组(p < 0.001)。此外,左旋组的镇痛药物消耗量显著低于罗哌组(p < 0.01)和安慰剂组(p < 0.001),罗哌组患者的镇痛药物消耗量显著低于安慰剂组患者(p < 0.001)。
左旋布比卡因局部组织浸润在减轻腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛方面比罗哌卡因更有效。