Park Sukhee, Park Ji-Hoon, Park Soyoon, Jang Jae Ni, Kim Chaeeun, Choi Young-Soon
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dongsan Medical Center, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 May 3;103(18):e38044. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038044.
Despite laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is a commonly performed operation under ambulatory setting, significant postoperative pain is still a major concern. The ultrasound-guided subcostal approach of transversus abdominis plane (sTAP) blocks and wound infiltration (WI) are both widely practiced techniques to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing LC. Although these methods have been shown to relieve postoperative pain effectively, the relative analgesic efficacy between ultrasound-guided sTAP blocks and WI is not well known.
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ultrasound-guided sTAP block versus WI for postoperative pain control in adult patients undergone LC. The search was performed until May 2023. Primary outcome was defined as 24-hour cumulative opioid consumption. Secondary outcomes were postoperative pain scores and the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
Finally, 6 RCTs were included, and data from 314 participants were retrieved. Postoperative 24-hour opioid consumption was significantly lower in ultrasound-guided sTAP group than in the WI group with a mean difference of -6.67 (95% confidence interval: -9.39 to - 3.95). The ultrasound-guided sTAP group also showed significantly lower pain scores. Incidence of PONV did not significantly differ between the 2 groups.
We conclude that there is low to moderate evidence to advocate that ultrasound-guided sTAP block has better analgesic effects than WI in patients undergoing LC. Further trials are needed with robust methodology and clearly defined outcomes.
尽管腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是在门诊环境下常见的手术,但术后显著疼痛仍是主要关注点。超声引导下肋下平面腹横肌阻滞(sTAP)和伤口浸润(WI)都是广泛应用于减轻LC患者术后疼痛的技术。虽然这些方法已被证明能有效缓解术后疼痛,但超声引导下sTAP阻滞与WI之间的相对镇痛效果尚不清楚。
我们检索了PubMed、EMBASE和CENTRAL,以确定所有比较超声引导下sTAP阻滞与WI对成年LC患者术后疼痛控制效果的随机对照试验(RCT)。检索持续至2023年5月。主要结局定义为24小时累积阿片类药物消耗量。次要结局为术后疼痛评分及术后恶心呕吐(PONV)发生率。
最终纳入6项RCT,共检索到314名参与者的数据。超声引导下sTAP组术后24小时阿片类药物消耗量显著低于WI组,平均差值为-6.67(95%置信区间:-9.39至-3.95)。超声引导下sTAP组的疼痛评分也显著更低。两组间PONV发生率无显著差异。
我们得出结论,有低到中等强度的证据支持超声引导下sTAP阻滞在LC患者中比WI具有更好的镇痛效果。需要采用更严谨的方法和明确界定结局的进一步试验。