Suppr超能文献

随机对照研究:在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛中,局部浸润与腹腔内灌注标准化剂量 0.2%罗哌卡因的比较:我们真的需要高剂量局部麻醉药吗——是时候重新考虑了!

Randomized controlled study of intraincisional infiltration versus intraperitoneal instillation of standardized dose of ropivacaine 0.2% in post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: Do we really need high doses of local anesthetics-time to rethink!

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College and Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh, 202002, India.

Department of Anesthesia, Institute of Medical Science, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, 22100, India.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3321-3341. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6053-z. Epub 2018 Jan 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies done to compare the efficacy of use of local anesthetics at intraperitoneal location versus intraincisional use had utilized equal amount of drugs at the two locations, usually 10-20 ml. Using this large amount of drug in the small space of intraincisional location as compared to similar amount of drug in large intraperitoneal space created an inadvertent bias in favor of patients receiving the drug intraincisionally so these patients naturally experienced less pain.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To conduct a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study by standardizing dose of local anesthetic, to compare the effectiveness of intraperitoneal against intraincisional use of ropivacaine 0.2% for post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain relief.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

294 patients underwent elective 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were triple blindly randomized. All patients received ~ 23 ml of solution, of which 20 ml was given intraperitoneally (1 ml/cm; 16 ml along right hemi-dome and 4 ml in gall bladder fossa) and ~ 3 ml intraincisionally (1 ml/cm of length of incision). Solution was either normal saline or drug (0.2% ropivacaine) depending on the group [controls (n = 86), intraperitoneal group (n = 100), and intraincisional group (n = 108)]. 5 different pain scales were used for assessment of overall pain. Pain scores were assessed at 5 points of time.

RESULTS

Patients in intraincisional group showed significantly less overall pain and rescue analgesia requirement (p < 0.05). Intraincisional group showed significantly less overall pain (p < 0.05) as compared to intraperitoneal group; however, use of rescue analgesia was comparable in the two groups (p > 0.05); and shoulder pain was significantly less in intraperitoneal group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The intraincisional use of injection ropivacaine at its minimum concentration of 0.2% in minimal doses of 1 ml/cm at the end of procedure provides significantly more post-operative analgesia as compared to intraperitoneal group and controls. However, for controlling shoulder pain, the use of intraperitoneal ropivacaine is desirable.

摘要

背景

早期比较局部麻醉剂腹腔内与切口内使用效果的研究,采用等量药物分别注射到两个部位,通常是 10-20ml。与腹腔内的大空间相比,将如此大量的药物注入切口内的小空间,可能会对接受切口内注射药物的患者产生无意识的偏向,使这些患者的疼痛自然减轻。

目的和目标

通过标准化局部麻醉剂剂量进行随机、三盲、安慰剂对照研究,比较罗哌卡因 0.2%在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后镇痛中的腹腔内与切口内使用效果。

材料和方法

294 例患者接受择期 4 孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术。患者进行三盲随机分组。所有患者均接受约 23ml 溶液,其中 20ml 腹腔内给药(1ml/cm;16ml 沿右半肝穹窿,4ml 胆囊窝),约 3ml 切口内给药(切口长度 1ml/cm)。溶液为生理盐水或药物(0.2%罗哌卡因),取决于组别[对照组(n=86)、腹腔内组(n=100)和切口内组(n=108)]。采用 5 种不同的疼痛评分量表评估整体疼痛。在 5 个时间点评估疼痛评分。

结果

切口内组患者的总体疼痛和需要解救性镇痛的程度明显较低(p<0.05)。与腹腔内组相比,切口内组的总体疼痛明显较低(p<0.05),但两组解救性镇痛的使用情况相当(p>0.05);切口内组的肩部疼痛明显较轻(p<0.05)。

结论

与腹腔内组和对照组相比,术毕以最低浓度 0.2%、最小剂量 1ml/cm 在切口内注射罗哌卡因,可提供更显著的术后镇痛效果。然而,为控制肩部疼痛,腹腔内注射罗哌卡因是可取的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验