• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

改善慢性病护理的干预措施:评估其有效性。

Interventions to improve chronic illness care: evaluating their effectiveness.

作者信息

Bodenheimer Thomas

机构信息

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, Building 80-83, San Francisco General Hospital, 1001 Potrero Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

出版信息

Dis Manag. 2003 Summer;6(2):63-71. doi: 10.1089/109350703321908441.

DOI:10.1089/109350703321908441
PMID:14577900
Abstract

Three overlapping initiatives can be found in the effort to improve the management of chronic illness: the report card initiative, the disease management industry, and "Improving Chronic Illness Care." The third of these initiatives proposes the Chronic Care Model to assist provider organizations in chronic care improvement. The Chronic Care Model is made up of six major elements: community resources, the health care system surrounding the provider organization, patient self-management, decision support, delivery system redesign, and clinical information systems. Within these elements are a number of components, for example, clinical practice guidelines, reminder prompts, disease registries, provider feedback systems, primary care teams, planned chronic care visits, and case management. A literature review is provided to summarize the effectiveness of these Chronic Care Model components.

摘要

在改善慢性病管理的努力中可以发现三项重叠的举措

成绩单举措、疾病管理行业以及“改善慢性病护理”。这些举措中的第三项提出了慢性病护理模型,以协助医疗机构改善慢性病护理。慢性病护理模型由六个主要要素组成:社区资源、医疗机构周围的医疗保健系统、患者自我管理、决策支持、交付系统重新设计以及临床信息系统。在这些要素中包含许多组成部分,例如临床实践指南、提醒提示、疾病登记、医疗机构反馈系统、初级保健团队、计划好的慢性病护理就诊以及病例管理。本文提供了一篇文献综述,以总结这些慢性病护理模型组成部分的有效性。

相似文献

1
Interventions to improve chronic illness care: evaluating their effectiveness.改善慢性病护理的干预措施:评估其有效性。
Dis Manag. 2003 Summer;6(2):63-71. doi: 10.1089/109350703321908441.
2
A population-based approach to diabetes management in a primary care setting: early results and lessons learned.基层医疗环境中基于人群的糖尿病管理方法:早期结果与经验教训。
Eff Clin Pract. 1998 Aug-Sep;1(1):12-22.
3
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness.改善慢性病患者的初级护理。
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.14.1775.
4
Organizing care for patients with chronic illness.为慢性病患者安排护理。
Milbank Q. 1996;74(4):511-44.
5
Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions.提高慢性病医疗保健质量。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):299-305. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.4.299.
6
Development of a diabetes care management curriculum in a family practice residency program.在家庭医学住院医师培训项目中开发糖尿病护理管理课程。
Dis Manag. 2004 Winter;7(4):314-24. doi: 10.1089/dis.2004.7.314.
7
System supports for chronic illness care and their relationship to clinical outcomes.慢性病护理的系统支持及其与临床结果的关系。
Top Health Inf Manage. 2001 Nov;22(2):65-72.
8
Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement.慢性病护理评估(ACIC):一种衡量质量改进的实用工具。
Health Serv Res. 2002 Jun;37(3):791-820. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.00049.
9
Group visits for chronic illness management: implementation challenges and recommendations.慢性病管理的小组就诊:实施挑战与建议
Nurs Econ. 2014 May-Jun;32(3):118-34, 147.
10
Improving chronic illness care-revisiting the role of care planning.改善慢性病护理——重新审视护理计划的作用。
Aust Fam Physician. 2008 Mar;37(3):161-4.

引用本文的文献

1
The Power of Environment: A Comprehensive Review of the Exposome's Role in Healthy Aging, Longevity, and Preventive Medicine-Lessons from Blue Zones and Cilento.环境的力量:关于暴露组在健康衰老、长寿和预防医学中作用的全面综述——来自蓝色区域和奇伦托的经验教训
Nutrients. 2025 Feb 18;17(4):722. doi: 10.3390/nu17040722.
2
Reducing Treatment Burden Among People With Chronic Conditions Using Machine Learning: Viewpoint.使用机器学习减轻慢性病患者的治疗负担:观点
JMIR Biomed Eng. 2022 Feb 10;7(1):e29499. doi: 10.2196/29499.
3
Greater temporal regularity of primary care visits was associated with reduced hospitalizations and mortality, even after controlling for continuity of care.
初级保健就诊的时间更有规律与住院和死亡率降低相关,即使在控制了连续护理后也是如此。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jul 20;23(1):777. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09808-7.
4
Structure and Function of a Provincial Renal Pharmacy Program: Applying the Chronic Care Model to Address Equitable Access to Medication and Pharmacy Services.省级肾脏药学项目的结构与功能:应用慢性病护理模式解决药物及药学服务的公平可及性问题
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2023 Jun 7;10:20543581231177840. doi: 10.1177/20543581231177840. eCollection 2023.
5
A pragmatic randomised controlled trial referring to a Personalised Self-management SUPport Programme (P-SUP) for persons enrolled in a disease management programme for type 2 diabetes mellitus and/or for coronary heart disease.一项针对参加 2 型糖尿病和/或冠心病疾病管理计划的个体的个性化自我管理支持计划(P-SUP)的实用随机对照试验。
Trials. 2021 Sep 27;22(1):659. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05636-4.
6
Psychometric evaluation of patient assessment of chronic illness care among Korean cancer survivors.韩国癌症幸存者慢性病照顾患者评估量表的心理计量学评估。
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 12;16(8):e0256119. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256119. eCollection 2021.
7
Self-management interventions for adolescents living with HIV: a systematic review.针对感染艾滋病毒青少年的自我管理干预措施:一项系统综述。
BMC Infect Dis. 2021 May 7;21(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12879-021-06072-0.
8
Mixed method evaluation of Relational Team Development (RELATED) to improve team-based care for complex patients with mental illness in primary care.混合方法评价关系型团队发展(RELATED),以改善初级保健中精神疾病复杂患者的基于团队的护理。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Oct 15;19(1):299. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2294-1.
9
Designing the relational team development intervention to improve management of mental health in primary care using iterative stakeholder engagement.设计关系型团队发展干预措施,通过迭代式利益相关者参与,改善初级保健中的心理健康管理。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Sep 6;20(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1010-z.
10
Qualitative research methods to investigate communication within a group aural rehabilitation intervention.定性研究方法调查小组助听康复干预中的交流。
Int J Audiol. 2019 Oct;58(10):651-660. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2019.1608377. Epub 2019 Jul 22.