Koetsawang S, Pachauri S
Ann Chir Gynaecol Suppl. 1977;66(5):240-6.
Findings are reported of a study conducted to evaluate and compare the safety and effectiveness of the spring-loaded clip and the electrocoagulation techniques of tubal occlusion via laparoscopy. The study was conducted from June, 1974 to June, 1975 on 300 cases in a Bangkok, Thailand hospital. Only patients who requested sterilization to limit family size were included in the study, and study patients were required to return for 6- and 12-month follow-up visits. To minimize possible patient and physician biases, all sterilization procedures were performed by one author (S. K.). and data were analyzed by the other author (S. P.). The specific operative technique was randomly assigned to the patient immediately prior to surgery, and the patient was unaware of the particular technique used. The findings showed no potentially serious complications for either technique. Neither complication rates nor incidence of pain were significantly different for the two procedures. The presence of adhesions was the most frequent cause of surgical difficulty in both techniques. No mechanical difficulties were reported. No pregnancies were reported within one year of sterilization.
报告了一项研究的结果,该研究旨在评估和比较弹簧夹和腹腔镜输卵管阻塞电凝技术的安全性和有效性。该研究于1974年6月至1975年6月在泰国曼谷的一家医院对300例患者进行。研究仅纳入要求绝育以限制家庭规模的患者,且研究患者需返回进行6个月和12个月的随访。为尽量减少患者和医生可能存在的偏倚,所有绝育手术均由一位作者(S.K.)进行,数据由另一位作者(S.P.)分析。具体手术技术在手术前立即随机分配给患者,患者并不知晓所使用的具体技术。结果表明,两种技术均未出现潜在的严重并发症。两种手术的并发症发生率和疼痛发生率均无显著差异。粘连的存在是两种技术中手术困难最常见的原因。未报告机械方面的困难。绝育后一年内未报告妊娠情况。