Suppr超能文献

门诊腹腔镜绝育术:电灼术与夹闭术的比较

Outpatient laparoscopic sterilisation: Comparison between electrocautery and clip application.

作者信息

Hughes G, Smith I

出版信息

Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1980 May;20(2):119-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1980.tb00108.x.

Abstract

In a personal prospective series of 504 day-case laparoscopic sterilisations in 1977-78, unipolar tubal electrocoagulation was compared with spring-loaded clip application. Two patients who had cautery required laparotomy because of serious bleeding and one because of accidental bowel diathermy. Clip application was free from serious complications, but caused more post-operative pain. The majority of patients were performing normal or light household duties within 24 hours of sterilisation.

摘要

在1977 - 1978年对504例日间腹腔镜绝育手术的个人前瞻性系列研究中,将单极输卵管电凝术与弹簧夹应用进行了比较。两名接受电灼术的患者因严重出血需要开腹手术,一名因意外肠热凝术需要开腹手术。使用夹子没有严重并发症,但术后疼痛更严重。大多数患者在绝育手术后24小时内就能进行正常或轻松的家务劳动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验