Shah Manish N, Bishop Paul, Lerner E Brooke, Czapranski Tim, Davis Eric A
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2003 Oct-Dec;7(4):434-9. doi: 10.1080/312703002132.
To identify emergency medical services (EMS) dispatch codes associated with basic life support (BLS) level of prehospital care, a proxy for low illness acuity.
This retrospective cohort study was conducted in an urban city with a single advanced life support level EMS provider. The 911 center was certified in using dispatch protocols from Priority Dispatch Corporation (Salt Lake City, UT). Dispatch data on all transported EMS patients from August 2001 to April 2002 were abstracted. The authors prospectively defined a low-acuity patient as one who received BLS-level care and defined a low-acuity dispatch code as one in which at least 90% of coded patients required only BLS care. For each dispatch code or code group, the authors calculated the fraction of patients who received BLS-level care. For each "A"-level (lowest category) dispatch code group, the fraction of patients receiving BLS-level care was also evaluated.
A total of 19,332 calls met inclusion criteria and were categorized into 118 dispatch codes or code groups. Twenty-eight codes or code groups with 7,801 patients met the authors' definition of low acuity. Overall, 7,394 patients received only BLS care (94.8%, 95% confidence interval: 94.3%-95.3%). Analysis of "A"-level dispatch code groups found BLS use rates of 52.8% to 99.3%.
Certain dispatch codes are associated with the delivery of BLS-level care, indicating identification of patients likely to be low acuity. These codes are not necessarily "A"-level dispatch codes, which are commonly considered to represent the lowest-acuity patients. Future studies are needed to prospectively validate that these codes do represent low-acuity patients.
确定与院前基础生命支持(BLS)护理水平相关的紧急医疗服务(EMS)调度代码,作为低疾病严重程度的一个指标。
这项回顾性队列研究在一个只有单一高级生命支持水平EMS提供者的城市进行。911中心获得了使用Priority Dispatch Corporation(犹他州盐湖城)调度协议的认证。提取了2001年8月至2002年4月所有转运的EMS患者的调度数据。作者前瞻性地将低严重程度患者定义为接受BLS水平护理的患者,并将低严重程度调度代码定义为至少90%的编码患者仅需要BLS护理的代码。对于每个调度代码或代码组,作者计算了接受BLS水平护理的患者比例。对于每个“A”级(最低类别)调度代码组,也评估了接受BLS水平护理的患者比例。
共有19332个呼叫符合纳入标准,并被分类为118个调度代码或代码组。28个代码或代码组的7801名患者符合作者对低严重程度的定义。总体而言,7394名患者仅接受了BLS护理(94.8%,95%置信区间:94.3%-95.3%)。对“A”级调度代码组的分析发现BLS使用率为52.8%至99.3%。
某些调度代码与BLS水平护理的提供相关,表明识别出可能为低严重程度的患者。这些代码不一定是“A”级调度代码,通常认为“A”级调度代码代表最低严重程度的患者。未来需要进行前瞻性研究以验证这些代码确实代表低严重程度患者。