吸入长效β受体激动剂用于稳定期慢性哮喘
Inhaled long acting beta agonists for stable chronic asthma.
作者信息
Walters E H, Walters J A E, Gibson M D P
机构信息
Discipline of Medicine, University of Tasmania Medical School, 43 , Collins Street, PO BOX 252-34, Hobart, 7001, Tasmania, Australia. Haydn.Walters @utas.edu.au
出版信息
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(4):CD001385. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001385.
BACKGROUND
Asthma is a common respiratory disease among both adults and children and short acting inhaled beta-2 agonists are used widely for 'reliever' bronchodilator therapy. Long acting beta-2 agonists were introduced as prospective 'symptom controllers' in addition to inhaled corticosteroid 'preventer' therapy (ICS).
OBJECTIVES
This review aimed to determine the benefit or detriment on the primary outcome of asthma control with the regular use of long acting inhaled beta-2 agonists compared with placebo.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We carried out searches using the Cochrane Airways Group trial register, most recently in October 2002. We searched bibliographies of identified RCTs for additional relevant RCTs and contacted authors of identified RCTs for other published and unpublished studies.
SELECTION CRITERIA
All randomised studies of at least two weeks duration, comparing a long acting inhaled beta-agonist given twice daily with a placebo, in chronic asthma.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Two reviewers performed data extraction and study quality assessment independently. We contacted authors of studies for missing data.
MAIN RESULTS
Eighty five studies met the inclusion criteria, 56 parallel group and 29 cross over design. Salmeterol xinafoate was used as long acting agent in 60 studies and formoterol fumarate in 25. The treatment period was two to four weeks in 32 studies, and 12 to 52 weeks in 53 studies. 34 study groups used concurrent inhaled corticosteroid treatment, 21 studies did not permit their use and 35 permitted either inhaled corticosteroid or cromones. There were significant advantages to long acting beta-2 agonist treatment compared to placebo for a variety of measurements of airway calibre including morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) (weighted mean difference (WMD) 26.78 L/min 95%CI 20.36 to 33.20), evening PEF (WMD 19.17 L/min 95%CI 11.63 to 26.73). They were associated with significantly fewer symptoms, less use of rescue medication and higher quality of life scores. The risk of exacerbation was lower in adults using regular inhaled corticosteroids.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Long acting beta-2 agonists are effective in the control of chronic asthma, and the evidence supports their use in addition to inhaled corticosteroids, as emphasised in current guidelines. Further research is needed on their use in children under 12 and in mild asthmatics not taking ICS.
背景
哮喘是成人和儿童中常见的呼吸道疾病,短效吸入型β-2激动剂广泛用于“缓解”支气管扩张治疗。长效β-2激动剂除吸入性糖皮质激素“预防”治疗(ICS)外,还作为潜在的“症状控制剂”被引入。
目的
本综述旨在确定与安慰剂相比,长期规律使用长效吸入型β-2激动剂对哮喘控制主要结局的益处或危害。
检索策略
我们使用Cochrane气道组试验注册库进行检索,最近一次检索时间为2002年10月。我们检索了已识别随机对照试验的参考文献以获取其他相关随机对照试验,并联系已识别随机对照试验的作者以获取其他已发表和未发表的研究。
选择标准
所有持续时间至少两周的随机研究,比较每日两次给予长效吸入型β-激动剂与安慰剂治疗慢性哮喘的效果。
数据收集与分析
两名综述作者独立进行数据提取和研究质量评估。我们联系研究作者获取缺失数据。
主要结果
85项研究符合纳入标准,其中56项为平行组设计,29项为交叉设计。60项研究使用昔萘酸沙美特罗作为长效药物,25项使用富马酸福莫特罗。32项研究的治疗期为2至4周,53项研究的治疗期为12至52周。34个研究组使用了吸入性糖皮质激素联合治疗,21项研究不允许使用,35项研究允许使用吸入性糖皮质激素或色酮类药物。与安慰剂相比,长效β-2激动剂治疗在多种气道口径测量指标上具有显著优势,包括晨间呼气峰值流速(PEF)(加权均数差值(WMD)26.78 L/分钟,95%置信区间20.36至33.20)、夜间PEF(WMD 19.17 L/分钟,95%置信区间11.63至26.73)。它们与显著更少的症状、更少的急救药物使用和更高的生活质量评分相关。在使用规律吸入性糖皮质激素的成人中,病情加重的风险较低。
综述作者结论
长效β-2激动剂在控制慢性哮喘方面有效,且如当前指南所强调,有证据支持其与吸入性糖皮质激素联合使用。需要进一步研究其在12岁以下儿童和未使用ICS的轻度哮喘患者中的应用。