• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2%与5%阿莫罗芬搽剂每周一次的疗效及安全性比较

Comparative efficacy and safety of amorolfine nail lacquer 2% versus 5% once weekly.

作者信息

Lauharanta J

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Clin Exp Dermatol. 1992 Sep;17 Suppl 1:41-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1992.tb00277.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2230.1992.tb00277.x
PMID:1458664
Abstract

Altogether 157 patients with onychomycosis affecting not more than 80% of the surface area of nail with intact lunula and matrix were treated once weekly for up to 6 months with amorolfine nail lacquer (2 or 5%) in a double-blind randomized design. Clinical examinations were carried out before, monthly during, and 1 and 3 months after therapy. Mycological examinations were performed before, 1 and 3 months after therapy. One hundred patients were evaluated. According to the overall assessment by the investigators, which was based on the clinical response and mycological findings, there was cure in 12%, improvement in 55% and failure in 33+ of the 2% group. The corresponding figures in the 5% group were: cure in 38%, improvement in 32% and failure in 30%. The difference in the number of cures was statistically significant in favour of the 5% nail lacquer. The most common pathogens isolated were Trichophyton rubrum in 59% of cases and Trichophyton mentagrophytes in 22%. Three months after the end of the treatment the mycological culture was negative in 55% of the 2% group and in 60% of the 5% group. Both concentrations were well tolerated. Only three patients (2%) experienced mild local adverse events. No systemic side-effects occurred and no patient discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. In conclusion, the 5% nail lacquer was more effective than the 2% nail lacquer when used once weekly for up to 6 months for the treatment of mild to moderate onychomycosis, and both concentrations were well tolerated.

摘要

总共157例甲癣患者,其病甲表面积受累不超过80%,甲半月和甲母质完整,采用双盲随机设计,每周一次外用阿莫罗芬搽剂(2%或5%),治疗长达6个月。治疗前、治疗期间每月、治疗后1个月和3个月进行临床检查。治疗前、治疗后1个月和3个月进行真菌学检查。对100例患者进行评估。根据研究者基于临床反应和真菌学检查结果的总体评估,2%组的治愈率为12%,改善率为55%,失败率为33%;5%组的相应数据为:治愈率为38%,改善率为32%,失败率为30%。治愈率差异具有统计学意义,5%阿莫罗芬搽剂疗效更佳。分离出的最常见病原体为红色毛癣菌(59%的病例)和须癣毛癣菌(22%)。治疗结束3个月后,2%组55%的患者真菌培养转阴,5%组为60%。两种浓度耐受性均良好。仅3例患者(2%)出现轻度局部不良反应。未发生全身副作用,也没有患者因不良反应而停药。总之,对于轻度至中度甲癣,每周一次外用5%阿莫罗芬搽剂治疗6个月比2%阿莫罗芬搽剂更有效,且两种浓度耐受性均良好。

相似文献

1
Comparative efficacy and safety of amorolfine nail lacquer 2% versus 5% once weekly.2%与5%阿莫罗芬搽剂每周一次的疗效及安全性比较
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1992 Sep;17 Suppl 1:41-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1992.tb00277.x.
2
Comparative efficacy and safety of amorolfine nail lacquer 5% in onychomycosis, once-weekly versus twice-weekly.5%阿莫罗芬搽剂治疗甲癣的疗效及安全性比较:每周一次与每周两次。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 1992 Sep;17 Suppl 1:44-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.1992.tb00278.x.
3
Topical treatment of onychomycosis with amorolfine 5% nail lacquer: comparative efficacy and tolerability of once and twice weekly use.5%阿莫罗芬搽剂局部治疗甲真菌病:每周一次和每周两次使用的疗效及耐受性比较
Dermatology. 1992;184 Suppl 1:21-4. doi: 10.1159/000247612.
4
Efficacy of topical resin lacquer, amorolfine and oral terbinafine for treating toenail onychomycosis: a prospective, randomized, controlled, investigator-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial.局部树脂漆、阿莫罗芬和口服特比萘芬治疗趾甲甲真菌病的疗效:一项前瞻性、随机、对照、研究者设盲、平行组临床试验。
Br J Dermatol. 2015 Oct;173(4):940-8. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13934. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of amorolfine 5% nail lacquer in combination with systemic antifungal agents for onychomycosis: A meta-analysis and systematic review.5%阿莫罗芬搽剂联合全身抗真菌药治疗甲真菌病的疗效和耐受性:一项荟萃分析与系统评价
Dermatol Ther. 2017 May;30(3). doi: 10.1111/dth.12457. Epub 2017 Jan 18.
6
Efficacy of 5% amorolfine nail lacquer in Neoscytalidium dimidiatum onychomycosis.5%阿莫罗芬搽剂治疗离蠕孢霉甲癣的疗效
J Dermatolog Treat. 2016 Aug;27(4):359-63. doi: 10.3109/09546634.2015.1109029. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
7
Patient-reported outcomes from two randomised studies comparing once-weekly application of amorolfine 5% nail lacquer to other methods of topical treatment in distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis.两项随机研究的患者报告结局比较了每周一次应用阿莫罗芬 5%指甲油与其他局部治疗方法治疗远端和侧位甲下型真菌感染的疗效。
Mycoses. 2017 Dec;60(12):800-807. doi: 10.1111/myc.12676. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
8
Ciclopirox nail lacquer topical solution 8% in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis.8%环吡酮甲涂剂局部溶液治疗趾甲甲真菌病
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000 Oct;43(4 Suppl):S70-80. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2000.109071.
9
A multicentre, randomised, parallel-group, double-blind, vehicle-controlled and open-label, active-controlled study (versus amorolfine 5%), to evaluate the efficacy and safety of terbinafine 10% nail lacquer in the treatment of onychomycosis.一项多中心、随机、平行分组、双盲、阳性药对照、开放性、自身对照研究(对比阿莫罗芬 5%),旨在评估特比萘芬 10% 指甲油治疗甲真菌病的疗效和安全性。
Mycoses. 2022 Apr;65(4):392-401. doi: 10.1111/myc.13392. Epub 2021 Dec 6.
10
A multicentre, randomized, controlled study of the efficacy, safety and cost-effectiveness of a combination therapy with amorolfine nail lacquer and oral terbinafine compared with oral terbinafine alone for the treatment of onychomycosis with matrix involvement.一项多中心、随机、对照研究,比较阿莫罗芬搽剂与口服特比萘芬联合治疗与单用口服特比萘芬治疗累及甲母质的甲真菌病的疗效、安全性和成本效益。
Br J Dermatol. 2007 Jul;157(1):149-57. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.07974.x. Epub 2007 Jun 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Dermatophyte-Selective Imidazole-Thiosemicarbazides: Potent In Vitro Activity Against and with No Anti- Effect.
Int J Mol Sci. 2025 Sep 26;26(19):9437. doi: 10.3390/ijms26199437.
2
Onychomycosis in Diabetics: A Common Infection with Potentially Serious Complications.糖尿病患者的甲癣:一种常见感染,伴有潜在严重并发症
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 13;15(8):1285. doi: 10.3390/life15081285.
3
Evaluation of safety and efficacy of calcipotriol 0.005% cream versus terbinafine hydrochloride 1% cream in treatment of onychomycosis; a randomized split body comparative pilot study.0.005%卡泊三醇乳膏与1%盐酸特比萘芬乳膏治疗甲真菌病的安全性和有效性评估;一项随机半体对照试验性研究。
Arch Dermatol Res. 2025 Feb 14;317(1):402. doi: 10.1007/s00403-025-03932-6.
4
Penetration Profile of Terbinafine Compared to Amorolfine in Mycotic Human Toenails Quantified by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Imaging.通过基质辅助激光解吸电离-傅里叶变换离子回旋共振成像定量分析特比萘芬与阿莫罗芬在人类真菌性趾甲中的渗透情况对比
Infect Dis Ther. 2024 Jun;13(6):1281-1290. doi: 10.1007/s40121-024-00979-2. Epub 2024 May 7.
5
How effective is topical miconazole or amorolfine for mild to moderately severe onychomycosis in primary care: the Onycho Trial - a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.在初级医疗保健中,外用咪康唑或阿莫罗芬治疗轻至中度严重甲真菌病的效果如何:甲真菌病试验——一项随机双盲安慰剂对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 3;14(5):e081914. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081914.
6
Evaluation of the antidermatophytic activity of potassium salts of N-acylhydrazinecarbodithioates and their aminotriazole-thione derivatives.评价 N-酰基腙二硫代羧酸酯及其氨基三唑硫酮衍生物的抗真菌活性。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 12;14(1):3521. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-54025-9.
7
Onychomycosis: Old and New.甲癣:新旧情况
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 May 12;9(5):559. doi: 10.3390/jof9050559.
8
Updated Perspectives on the Diagnosis and Management of Onychomycosis.甲癣诊断与治疗的最新观点
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2022 Sep 15;15:1933-1957. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S362635. eCollection 2022.
9
Iontophoresis to Overcome the Challenge of Nail Permeation: Considerations and Optimizations for Successful Ungual Drug Delivery.经皮离子导入克服指甲渗透挑战:成功透甲药物递送的考虑因素和优化。
AAPS J. 2021 Jan 13;23(1):25. doi: 10.1208/s12248-020-00552-y.
10
Topical and device-based treatments for fungal infections of the toenails.用于治疗趾甲真菌感染的局部和基于器械的疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 16;1(1):CD012093. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012093.pub2.