Tee Daniel, DiStefano Joseph
Department of Computer Science, 4711 Boelter Hall, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1596, USA.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2004 Jan;130(1):15-24. doi: 10.1007/s00432-003-0491-1. Epub 2003 Oct 28.
Tumor cells secrete diffusible substances collectively called tumor angiogenic factors (TAFs), most notably vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which in turn stimulate endothelial cell migration and thus angiogenesis, or new blood vessel formation. Anti-angiogenic drugs for cancer treatment are receiving much attention, with endostatin identified as one of the potent inhibitors. Although the mechanisms of action of endostatin are yet to be fully elucidated, there is evidence that bFGF and endostatin may bind competitively to heparan sulfate proteoglycan receptors on endothelial cells, or endostatin may otherwise downregulate bFGF or VEGF and its receptors, putatively inhibiting cell proliferation. To test these and other hypotheses of inhibitory action that can be similarly formulated, for other TAF inhibitors as well as endostatin, we have developed a mathematical model of extratumoral angiogenesis in cancer in response to specific anti-angiogenic drug treatment. It is built on previous work, a modification and augmentation of published models, and is expressed as four nonlinear partial differential equations, with specific terms for endothelial cell proliferation, degradation, and endostatin-TAF inhibition, and a stochastic, discretized version of this model to represent vessel growth. Our extended model reproduces the simulated kinetics of angiogenesis in a mouse tumor model reported earlier. We assessed the anti-angiogenic kinetic behavior of our extended model by simulating dynamic responses to exogenous endostatin treatment in the same mouse model, using four dosage regimens, two of these reported for in vivo pre-clinical or clinical studies, and two 10 times greater: daily single bolus injections of 20 mg/kg per day and 200 mg/kg per day, and constant infusions of 20 mg/kg per day and 200 mg/kg per day, each for 20 simulated days. We also explored the effects of drug clearance, over an eightfold range of clearance rates that include scaled clearances for endostatin, a sister-drug angiostatin, or similar drugs with clearances in this range. Predictively, our simulation results suggest ineffectiveness of the bolus injection protocols, consistent with in vivo data with angiostatin treatment, whereas simulated constant infusion of endostatin in the mouse model effectively suppresses angiogenesis after only 3 days of treatment, at the lowest dose, over a wide range of drug clearance rates.
肿瘤细胞分泌一类可扩散物质,统称为肿瘤血管生成因子(TAFs),其中最显著的是血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)和碱性成纤维细胞生长因子(bFGF),它们反过来刺激内皮细胞迁移,从而促进血管生成,即新血管的形成。用于癌症治疗的抗血管生成药物备受关注,内皮抑素被确定为强效抑制剂之一。尽管内皮抑素的作用机制尚未完全阐明,但有证据表明,bFGF和内皮抑素可能竞争性结合内皮细胞上的硫酸乙酰肝素蛋白聚糖受体,或者内皮抑素可能以其他方式下调bFGF或VEGF及其受体,从而抑制细胞增殖。为了验证这些以及其他可以类似方式提出的关于抑制作用的假设,对于其他TAF抑制剂以及内皮抑素,我们建立了一个癌症瘤外血管生成的数学模型,以响应特定的抗血管生成药物治疗。该模型基于之前的工作,对已发表的模型进行了修改和扩充,用四个非线性偏微分方程表示,其中包含内皮细胞增殖、降解以及内皮抑素 - TAF抑制的特定项,还有该模型的一个随机离散版本来表示血管生长。我们扩展后的模型重现了先前报道的小鼠肿瘤模型中血管生成的模拟动力学。我们通过在同一小鼠模型中模拟对外源内皮抑素治疗的动态反应,评估了扩展模型的抗血管生成动力学行为,使用了四种给药方案,其中两种是在体内临床前或临床研究中报道过的,另外两种剂量是其10倍:每天单次推注20mg/kg和200mg/kg,以及每天持续输注20mg/kg和200mg/kg,每种方案均模拟20天。我们还在八倍的清除率范围内探究了药物清除的影响,该范围包括内皮抑素、其姊妹药物血管抑素或清除率在此范围内的类似药物的比例清除率。预测性地,我们的模拟结果表明推注给药方案无效,这与血管抑素治疗的体内数据一致,而在小鼠模型中模拟持续输注内皮抑素,在最低剂量下,仅治疗3天后就能在广泛的药物清除率范围内有效抑制血管生成。