Suppr超能文献

在免疫抑制宿主中使用干扰素和利巴韦林的临床及免疫学影响。

The clinical and immunologic impact of using interferon and ribavirin in the immunosuppressed host.

作者信息

Braun Marius, Vierling John M

机构信息

Center for Liver Diseases and Transplantation and Burns and Allen Research Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.

出版信息

Liver Transpl. 2003 Nov;9(11):S79-89. doi: 10.1053/jlts.2003.50257.

Abstract
  1. Allograft infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) in immunosuppressed adults results in decreased allograft and patient survival. 2. Risk factors for accelerated progression of hepatitis C related to immunosuppression include treated episodes of acute cellular rejection (ACR), pulse therapy with methylprednisolone, and use of OKT3. 3. Both interferon alfa (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin (RVN) show antiviral actions against HCV and stimulate innate and adaptive immunity to increase cytolysis and polarize T helper subtype 1 (T(H)1) responses. In addition, IFN-alpha inhibits fibrogenesis in the liver. 4. Both IFN-alpha and RVN have been studied in immunosuppressed liver transplant recipients as prophylaxis or treatment of established hepatitis C to reduce allograft failure and patient mortality. Reported protocols include monotherapies with RVN, standard IFN-alpha, and pegylated IFN-alpha and combination therapies using RVN and either standard IFN-alpha or pegylated IFN-alpha. 5. The clinical impact of using IFN-alpha and RVN in highly selected immunosuppressed patients varied among studies. Combination therapy with standard IFN-alpha and RVN resulted in the greatest sustained biochemical and virological responses. However, no therapy prevented progression of acute cholestatic hepatitis C despite evidence of virological responses. Substantial proportions of patients developed adverse events requiring dose reduction or discontinuation that compromised efficacy. RVN monotherapy was not only virologically ineffective, but may have stimulated hepatic fibrosis. Current data regarding monotherapy or combination therapy with pegylated IFN-alpha are limited, but encouraging. 6. Despite potent immunostimulatory actions of both IFN-alpha and RVN that enhance natural killer, T(H)1, their use did not significantly increase the incidence of ACR. 7. Additional studies are needed to resolve the controversy over prophylaxis versus treatment of established disease and the potential utility of low-dose maintenance IFN-alpha therapy to retard fibrogenesis without clearing HCV. 8. After new, less toxic, and more potent antiviral agents become available, they should be tested immediately in patients with hepatitis C post-liver transplantation.
摘要
  1. 免疫抑制的成年患者同种异体移植感染丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)会导致同种异体移植物存活率和患者存活率降低。2. 与免疫抑制相关的丙型肝炎加速进展的危险因素包括急性细胞排斥反应(ACR)的治疗发作、甲泼尼龙脉冲治疗以及OKT3的使用。3. 干扰素α(IFN-α)和利巴韦林(RVN)均显示出针对HCV的抗病毒作用,并刺激先天免疫和适应性免疫,以增加细胞溶解并使辅助性T细胞1型(T(H)1)反应极化。此外,IFN-α可抑制肝脏中的纤维生成。4. IFN-α和RVN均已在免疫抑制的肝移植受者中进行研究,作为预防或治疗已确诊的丙型肝炎以减少同种异体移植物失败和患者死亡率。报告的方案包括RVN单药治疗、标准IFN-α和聚乙二醇化IFN-α以及使用RVN与标准IFN-α或聚乙二醇化IFN-α的联合治疗。5. 在高度选择的免疫抑制患者中使用IFN-α和RVN的临床影响在不同研究中有所不同。标准IFN-α和RVN联合治疗产生了最大的持续生化和病毒学反应。然而,尽管有病毒学反应的证据,但没有治疗方法能阻止急性胆汁淤积性丙型肝炎的进展。相当比例的患者出现不良事件,需要减少剂量或停药,这影响了疗效。RVN单药治疗不仅在病毒学上无效,而且可能刺激肝纤维化。目前关于聚乙二醇化IFN-α单药治疗或联合治疗的数据有限,但令人鼓舞。6. 尽管IFN-α和RVN都有强大的免疫刺激作用,可增强自然杀伤细胞、T(H)1,但它们的使用并未显著增加ACR的发生率。7. 需要进一步的研究来解决关于预防与治疗已确诊疾病的争议以及低剂量维持IFN-α治疗在不清除HCV的情况下延缓纤维生成的潜在效用。8. 在新型、毒性较小且更有效的抗病毒药物问世后,应立即在肝移植后丙型肝炎患者中进行测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验