Suppr超能文献

评估临床症状的似然比:处理模糊性。

Assessing likelihood ratio of clinical symptoms: handling vagueness.

作者信息

Rutten A L B, Stolper C F, Lugten R F G, Barthels R W J M

机构信息

Commissie Methode en Validering VHAN (Dutch Association of Homeopathic Physicians), The Netherlands.

出版信息

Homeopathy. 2003 Oct;92(4):182-6. doi: 10.1016/j.homp.2003.08.013.

Abstract

Clinical symptoms including homeopathic symptoms are often vague. There is reluctance to assess clinical symptoms as diagnostic instruments because they are hard to define. Still, clinical symptoms appear effective in daily practice. Expert systems and neural networks handle vague data successfully. Theoretical considerations predict the kind of problems we may expect. There is a difference between quantitative and qualitative vagueness. Vague data cause problems if we try to prove a hypothesis because of expectation bias. We assess likelihood ratio of homeopathic symptoms only to improve the method.

摘要

包括顺势疗法症状在内的临床症状往往模糊不清。人们不愿将临床症状作为诊断工具进行评估,因为它们难以界定。尽管如此,临床症状在日常实践中似乎很有效。专家系统和神经网络能够成功处理模糊数据。理论思考预测了我们可能遇到的问题类型。定量模糊和定性模糊之间存在差异。如果我们试图因期望偏差而证明一个假设,模糊数据就会引发问题。我们评估顺势疗法症状的似然比只是为了改进方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验