Suppr超能文献

Comparison of thiopentone versus althesin for caesarean section.

作者信息

Hollmèn A, Karvonen P, Pihlajaniemi R

出版信息

Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1976;65(6):392-7.

PMID:14588
Abstract

Thiopentone and Althesin were compared in 50 patients undergoing general anaesthesia for Caesarean section. The patients were divided into group A (24 mothers) were thiopentone (3.5 mg/kg) was used for induction and group B (26 mothers) where Althesin (80 mu1/kg) was employed. Blood samples for estimating the maternal and umbilical venous and arterial blood pH, pCO2, BD and pO2 were taken at the time of delivery. The clinical condition of the newborn were estimated by the Apgar score. Postoperatively the mothers were interviewed about thei subjective opinion concerning the anaesthesia. The interview showed equal acceptance of both induction agents. The umbilical venous and arterial pH, pCO2 and BD were well within the normal physiological range and there was no significant intergroup difference. The only significant differences were the lower umbilical venous and arterial pO2 values in the Althesin group. The clinical condition of the newborn (Apgar score) showed no significant difference between the two groups.

摘要

相似文献

2
Althesin as an induction agent for Caesarean section.
Br J Anaesth. 1975 Nov;47(11):1213-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/47.11.1213.
4
Alfathesin for anaesthetic induction at caesarean section.
S Afr Med J. 1975 Jun 28;49(27):1095-6.
5
[Althesin in cesarean section].
Minerva Anestesiol. 1980 Feb;46(2):301-4.
6
Anaesthetic induction for Caesarean section. Althesin versus thiopentone.
Anaesthesia. 1974 Nov;29(6):689-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1974.tb00754.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验