Ratcliffe F M, Evans J M
Nuffield Department of Anaesthetics, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK.
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1993 May;10(3):175-81.
A comparison was made of the acid-base and Apgar status of neonates following general (n = 34), spinal (n = 28) and epidural (n = 23) anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Neonates delivered following spinal anaesthesia were more acidaemic (pH = 7.249) (P < 0.05) than those delivered following epidural (pH = 7.291) or general anaesthesia (pH = 7.296) despite measures taken to minimize hypotension. The percentage of neonates with a 1 min Apgar score > or = 7 was 96% after epidural anaesthesia, 93% after spinal anaesthesia and 75% after general anaesthesia. The difference between epidural and general anaesthesia was significant (P < 0.05). Using these two measures of neonatal wellbeing, epidural anaesthesia provided the most favourable outcome.
对择期剖宫产采用全身麻醉(n = 34)、脊髓麻醉(n = 28)和硬膜外麻醉(n = 23)后新生儿的酸碱状态和阿氏评分进行了比较。尽管采取了措施尽量减少低血压,但脊髓麻醉后娩出的新生儿比硬膜外麻醉(pH = 7.291)或全身麻醉(pH = 7.296)后娩出的新生儿更酸血症(pH = 7.249)(P < 0.05)。硬膜外麻醉后1分钟阿氏评分≥7分的新生儿百分比为96%,脊髓麻醉后为93%,全身麻醉后为75%。硬膜外麻醉和全身麻醉之间的差异具有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。使用这两种评估新生儿健康状况的指标,硬膜外麻醉提供了最有利的结果。