Barron J H, Russell E W
Veterans Administration Medical Center, Miami, Florida 33125, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1992;7(2):175-88.
In order to determine whether the "classic" alcoholic WAIS pattern is the result of right hemisphere damage or the loss of fluid intelligence abilities, right-hemisphere damaged, left-hemisphere damaged, alcoholic, and control groups of 40 subjects each were matched on the variables of age and education. They were administered the WAIS-Revised (WAIS-R) and four sensory and motor measures that were sensitive to lateralized damage but not to fluidity. The alcoholic group showed the "classic" pattern of a lower performance than verbal WAIS IQ. Although the left hand scores on the sensory and motor tests were significantly more impaired than the right hand scores for the right-hemisphere damaged group they were not for the alcoholic group. These results did not support the right hemisphere theory. Rather, as indicated by further analysis, the pattern is most adequately explained by the fluidity theory.
为了确定“经典”的酒精性韦氏成人智力量表模式是右半球损伤的结果还是流体智力能力丧失的结果,分别选取了40名右半球损伤、左半球损伤、酗酒和对照组的受试者,使他们在年龄和教育程度变量上相匹配。对他们进行了韦氏成人智力量表修订版(WAIS-R)以及四项对偏侧化损伤敏感但对流体性不敏感的感觉和运动测量。酗酒组表现出操作智商低于言语智商的“经典”模式。尽管右半球损伤组在感觉和运动测试中的左手得分明显比右手得分受损更严重,但酗酒组并非如此。这些结果不支持右半球理论。相反,进一步分析表明,该模式最能由流体性理论来解释。