Ross L, Thrasher M, Long C J
Memphis State University, Tennessee 38152, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1990;5(3):273-85.
This study addressed the issue concerning neuropsychological assessment and the determination of hemispheric lateralization. Based upon the different processing strategies employed by each hemisphere, several neuropsychological tests were hypothesized to discriminate between left hemisphere and right hemisphere damage. Lesion localization was determined by neurological examination, electroencephalography, and/or neuroradiological procedures for the 111 patients (47 right hemisphere, 64 left hemisphere) who were given a neuropsychological evaluation. Two strategies are presented for lateralizing cerebral impairment, a discriminant analysis and a decision process using one standard deviation as a cut-off point. These two strategies are compared with The Key Approach of Russell, Neuringer, and Goldstein (1970) and Simpson and Vega's WAIS Sign Test. The efficacy of decision strategies used to predict lateralization is discussed.
本研究探讨了神经心理学评估及半球偏侧化判定的问题。基于每个半球所采用的不同加工策略,假设通过若干神经心理学测试来区分左半球和右半球损伤。对接受神经心理学评估的111例患者(47例右半球损伤,64例左半球损伤),通过神经学检查、脑电图和/或神经放射学程序确定损伤部位。提出了两种用于确定脑损伤偏侧化的策略,即判别分析和以一个标准差为临界点的决策过程。将这两种策略与拉塞尔、诺伊林格和戈尔茨坦(1970年)的关键方法以及辛普森和维加的韦氏成人智力量表符号检验进行比较。讨论了用于预测偏侧化的决策策略的有效性。