Suhr Julie A
Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Porter Hall 200, Athens, OH 45701-2979, USA.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2002 Jan;17(1):69-77.
The normal pattern of performance on list-learning tasks is to recall more words from the beginning (primacy) and end (recency) of the list. This pattern is also seen in patients with closed head injury, but malingerers tend to recall less words from the beginning of word lists, leading to a suppressed primacy effect. The present study examined this pattern on both learning trials and delayed recall of the Auditory Verbal Learning Test (AVLT) in 34 persons performing with normal effort, 38 naive malingerers, 33 warned malingerers, and 29 head-injured patients. Both malingering groups had lower scores on the primacy portion of the list during learning trials, while normals and head-injured patients had normal serial position curves. During delayed recall, normals and head-injured patients did better than the two malingering groups on middle and recency portions of the list. Findings suggest that the serial position effect during learning trials may be a useful pattern of performance to watch for when suspicious of malingering.
在列表学习任务中,正常的表现模式是从列表开头(首因效应)和结尾(近因效应)回忆起更多的单词。这种模式在闭合性颅脑损伤患者中也能看到,但伪装者往往从单词列表开头回忆起的单词较少,导致首因效应受到抑制。本研究在34名正常努力完成任务者、38名初次伪装者、33名被警告的伪装者和29名颅脑损伤患者中,对听觉词语学习测验(AVLT)的学习试验和延迟回忆进行了这种模式的研究。在学习试验中,两个伪装组在列表首因部分的得分都较低,而正常人和颅脑损伤患者的系列位置曲线正常。在延迟回忆中,正常人和颅脑损伤患者在列表中间和近因部分的表现优于两个伪装组。研究结果表明,在学习试验中的系列位置效应可能是在怀疑伪装时值得关注的一种有用的表现模式。