Suppr超能文献

湾区言语学习测验(BAVLT):常模数据以及重复测试、模拟诈病和创伤性脑损伤的影响。

The Bay Area Verbal Learning Test (BAVLT): Normative Data and the Effects of Repeated Testing, Simulated Malingering, and Traumatic Brain Injury.

作者信息

Woods David L, Wyma John M, Herron Timothy J, Yund E William

机构信息

Human Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care SystemMartinez, CA, USA; University of California Davis Department of NeurologySacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neurosciences, University of California DavisDavis, CA, USA; University of California Davis Center for Mind and BrainDavis, CA, USA; NeuroBehavioral Systems, Inc.Berkeley, CA, USA.

Human Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, Veterans Affairs Northern California Health Care System Martinez, CA, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jan 12;10:654. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00654. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

Verbal learning tests (VLTs) are widely used to evaluate memory deficits in neuropsychiatric and developmental disorders. However, their validity has been called into question by studies showing significant differences in VLT scores obtained by different examiners. Here we describe the computerized Bay Area Verbal Learning Test (BAVLT), which minimizes inter-examiner differences by incorporating digital list presentation and automated scoring. In the 10-min BAVLT, a 12-word list is presented on three acquisition trials, followed by a distractor list, immediate recall of the first list, and, after a 30-min delay, delayed recall and recognition. In Experiment 1, we analyzed the performance of 195 participants ranging in age from 18 to 82 years. Acquisition trials showed strong primacy and recency effects, with scores improving over repetitions, particularly for mid-list words. Inter-word intervals (IWIs) increased with successive words recalled. Omnibus scores (summed over all trials except recognition) were influenced by age, education, and sex (women outperformed men). In Experiment 2, we examined BAVLT test-retest reliability in 29 participants tested with different word lists at weekly intervals. High intraclass correlation coefficients were seen for omnibus and acquisition scores, IWIs, and a categorization index reflecting semantic reorganization. Experiment 3 examined the performance of Experiment 2 participants when feigning symptoms of traumatic brain injury. Although 37% of simulated malingerers showed abnormal ( < 0.05) omnibus z-scores, z-score cutoffs were ineffective in discriminating abnormal malingerers from control participants with abnormal scores. In contrast, four malingering indices (recognition scores, primacy/recency effects, learning rate across acquisition trials, and IWIs) discriminated the two groups with 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity. Experiment 4 examined the performance of a small group of patients with mild or severe TBI. Overall, both patient groups performed within the normal range, although significant performance deficits were seen in some patients. The BAVLT improves the speed and replicability of verbal learning assessments while providing comprehensive measures of retrieval timing, semantic organization, and primacy/recency effects that clarify the nature of performance.

摘要

言语学习测试(VLTs)被广泛用于评估神经精神疾病和发育障碍中的记忆缺陷。然而,不同考官获得的VLT分数存在显著差异的研究对其有效性提出了质疑。在此,我们描述了计算机化的湾区言语学习测试(BAVLT),它通过采用数字列表呈现和自动评分来最大限度地减少考官间差异。在10分钟的BAVLT测试中,一个包含12个单词的列表会在三次学习试验中呈现,随后是一个干扰列表、对第一个列表的即时回忆,以及在30分钟延迟后进行的延迟回忆和识别。在实验1中,我们分析了195名年龄在18至82岁之间参与者的表现。学习试验显示出强烈的首因效应和近因效应,分数随着重复次数的增加而提高,尤其是对于列表中间的单词。随着回忆的连续单词,词间间隔(IWIs)增加。综合分数(除识别外所有试验的总和)受年龄、教育程度和性别影响(女性表现优于男性)。在实验2中,我们在29名参与者中检验了BAVLT的重测信度,这些参与者每周使用不同的单词列表进行测试。综合分数、学习分数、IWIs以及反映语义重组的分类指数的组内相关系数都很高。实验3检验了实验2参与者伪装创伤性脑损伤症状时的表现。尽管37%的模拟诈病者显示出异常(<0.05)的综合z分数,但z分数临界值在区分异常诈病者和分数异常的对照参与者方面无效。相比之下,四个诈病指数(识别分数、首因/近因效应、学习试验中的学习率以及IWIs)以80%的敏感性和80%的特异性区分了两组。实验4检验了一小群轻度或重度创伤性脑损伤患者的表现。总体而言,两个患者组的表现都在正常范围内,尽管一些患者存在显著的表现缺陷。BAVLT提高了言语学习评估的速度和可重复性,同时提供了检索时间、语义组织以及首因/近因效应的综合测量,从而阐明了表现的本质。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d241/5226952/107cbb371ef2/fnhum-10-00654-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验