Wanders S L, ten Kate J, van der Linden E, Derhaag J, Dinjens W N, Bosman F T
Institute for Radiotherapy, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Histochemistry. 1992 Nov;98(4):267-70. doi: 10.1007/BF00271041.
The ex vivo labelling of DNA-synthesizing epithelial cells in colonic and vaginal mucosa was compared with in vivo labelling. For this purpose, in vivo S-phase cells were labelled with [3H]thymidine (Tdr) and ex vivo labelling was continued by culturing tissue specimens in bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU). Various methods of tissue culture were employed in order to improve diffusion of medium (and BrdU) in the tissue. BrdU and 3H-TdR labelling were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and autoradiography respectively. Ex vivo labelling resulted in a patchy distribution of labelled cells, which did not correspond with the 3H-TdR labelling pattern obtained in vivo. Under the described conditions ex vivo labelling does not appear to be a reliable for estimation of the proliferative activities in vivo.
将结肠和阴道黏膜中DNA合成上皮细胞的体外标记与体内标记进行了比较。为此,体内S期细胞用[3H]胸腺嘧啶核苷(TdR)进行标记,体外标记则通过在组织标本中培养溴脱氧尿苷(BrdU)来继续进行。采用了各种组织培养方法以改善培养基(和BrdU)在组织中的扩散。分别通过免疫组织化学和放射自显影对BrdU和3H-TdR标记进行评估。体外标记导致标记细胞呈斑驳分布,这与体内获得的3H-TdR标记模式不相符。在所描述的条件下,体外标记似乎不是体内增殖活性评估的可靠方法。