Suppr超能文献

完整胰岛素原和总胰岛素原特异性化学发光检测法的临床与实验室评估

Clinical and laboratory evaluation of specific chemiluminescence assays for intact and total proinsulin.

作者信息

Pfützner Andreas, Kunt Thomas, Langenfeld Matthias, Löbig Mirjam, Knesovic Maja, Forst Thomas

机构信息

IKFE, Institute of Clinical Research and Development, Mainz, Germany.

出版信息

Clin Chem Lab Med. 2003 Sep;41(9):1234-8. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.2003.189.

Abstract

Measurement of proinsulin is an important tool in the assessment of pancreatic beta cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes. The goal of this study was to perform a technical and clinical evaluation of two specific chemiluminescence assays (CLIA) for the determination of intact and total proinsulin in comparison to a radioimmunoassay (RIA) method for the measurement of total proinsulin. A total of 191 serum samples from patients with type 2 diabetes were used to perform a regression analysis. The total proinsulin CLIA showed higher proinsulin levels than the two other proinsulin assays (mean +/- SD: 55.9 +/- 58.1 pmol/l, p < 0.001 in both cases). The intact proinsulin CLIA (22.5 +/- 20.9 pmol/l) gave lower values than the RIA for total proinsulin (31.9 +/- 25.4 pmol/l, p < 0.001 vs. CLIA, r = 0.948). The RIA has a 95% cross-reactivity to des31,32-proinsulin, which is secreted during the process of beta cell deterioration. The intact proinsulin CLIA has virtually no cross-reactivity with des31,32-proinsulin (1.4%) and is therefore more specific for intact proinsulin than the RIA. This test does not measure further degradation products, in contrast to the total proinsulin CLIA. The CLIA is, therefore, more specific for total proinsulin measurement than the RIA. Both CLIAs could be performed much faster (4 hours) than the RIA method (75 hours/ 4 days). In conclusion, the CLIA methods show improved qualitative outcomes, higher specificity and several technical advantages over the RIA method.

摘要

胰岛素原的测定是评估2型糖尿病患者胰岛β细胞功能的一项重要工具。本研究的目的是对两种用于测定完整和总胰岛素原的特定化学发光免疫分析法(CLIA)进行技术和临床评估,并与用于测定总胰岛素原的放射免疫分析法(RIA)进行比较。共使用了191例2型糖尿病患者的血清样本进行回归分析。总胰岛素原CLIA显示的胰岛素原水平高于其他两种胰岛素原检测方法(均值±标准差:55.9±58.1 pmol/L,两种情况均p<0.001)。完整胰岛素原CLIA(22.5±20.9 pmol/L)得出的值低于总胰岛素原的RIA(31.9±25.4 pmol/L,与CLIA相比p<0.001,r = 0.948)。RIA对β细胞恶化过程中分泌的去31,32-胰岛素原具有95%的交叉反应性。完整胰岛素原CLIA与去31,32-胰岛素原几乎没有交叉反应性(1.4%),因此与RIA相比,对完整胰岛素原更具特异性。与总胰岛素原CLIA不同,该检测方法不测量进一步的降解产物。因此,CLIA在测量总胰岛素原方面比RIA更具特异性。两种CLIA方法的检测速度都比RIA方法(75小时/4天)快得多(4小时)。总之,与RIA方法相比,CLIA方法显示出更好的定性结果、更高的特异性和多项技术优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验