Suppr超能文献

比较用化学发光免疫分析法和放射免疫分析法测定的母犬血液中孕酮的值。

Comparing the values of progesterone in the blood of bitches as measured with a chemiluminescence immunoassay and a radioimmunoassay.

作者信息

Nöthling Johan O, De Cramer Kurt G M

机构信息

Section of Reproduction, Department of Production Animal Studies, Faculty of Veterinary Science, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.

出版信息

Reprod Domest Anim. 2018 Oct;53(5):1136-1141. doi: 10.1111/rda.13216. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

Abstract

A I radioimmunoassay (RIA) has long been used to determine the value of progesterone in serum or plasma of bitches but was discontinued in 2014. A chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) gained prominence since 2003 to determine the value of progesterone in serum of bitches but the assay changed in 2012. This study assessed the agreement between progesterone values obtained with RIA in plasma (progRIA) and with the post-2012 CLIA (progCLIA) in the serum of bitches. ProgCLIA was determined in 110 serum samples from 40 bitches in pro-oestrus or early oestrus and compared to progRIA in plasma samples collected from the same bitches at the same time, where progRIA had a uniform distribution between 0.5 and 25 nmol/L. Two replicate analyses of each serum or plasma sample were simultaneously done in the same assay. For RIA and CLIA, the intra-assay CVs were 5.85% and 6.70% and the interassay CVs 8.45% and 9.16%. For RIA and CLIA the progesterone values obtained with replicate analyses differed by as much as 11%-31% in 25% of samples. On average, the value of progCLIA was 85% of that of progRIA (95% CI 58%-112%, n = 110), with 88% of progCLIAs being lower than the progRIAs. This study shows that RIA and CLIA may yield replicate values that differ by as much as 11%-30% in about a quarter of samples analysed, necessitating replicate analyses if precise values are required. The study provides an equation by which to estimate progCLIA from progRIA.

摘要

A I放射免疫分析(RIA)长期以来一直用于测定母犬血清或血浆中的孕酮值,但在2014年停止使用。自2003年以来,化学发光免疫分析(CLIA)开始用于测定母犬血清中的孕酮值,但该分析方法在2012年发生了变化。本研究评估了用血浆RIA法(progRIA)和2012年后血清CLIA法(progCLIA)测得的母犬孕酮值之间的一致性。对40只处于发情前期或发情早期的母犬的110份血清样本进行了progCLIA测定,并与同一时间从这些母犬采集的血浆样本中的progRIA进行比较,其中progRIA在0.5至25 nmol/L之间呈均匀分布。每个血清或血浆样本在同一分析中同时进行两次重复分析。对于RIA和CLIA,批内变异系数分别为5.85%和6.70%,批间变异系数分别为8.45%和9.16%。对于RIA和CLIA,重复分析获得的孕酮值在25%的样本中相差高达11%-31%。平均而言,progCLIA的值是progRIA的85%(95%可信区间58%-112%,n = 110),88%的progCLIA低于progRIA。本研究表明,在大约四分之一的分析样本中,RIA和CLIA可能产生相差高达11%-30%的重复值,如果需要精确值,则需要进行重复分析。该研究提供了一个根据progRIA估算progCLIA的方程。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验