Segerstrom Suzanne C, Stanton Annette L, Alden Lynn E, Shortridge Brenna E
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):909-21. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.909.
Although repetitive thought (RT) styles such as worry, rumination, and processing correlate positively, they have divergent effects on well-being, suggesting important dimensional variation. In Study 1, multidimensional scaling identified 2 dimensions--positive versus negative content valence and searching versus solving purpose--among students (N=978) who completed standard RT measures. In Study 2, students (N=100) sorted 25 descriptions of RT. Multidimensional scaling identified 4 dimensions, including valence and purpose. Content valence associated with valenced affect; solving associated with less aroused affect and less polarized appraisals of thought topics. In Study 3, valence and purpose of RT descriptions by women in a breast cancer prevention trial (N=62) predicted concurrent affect and psychological and physical well-being.
尽管诸如担忧、沉思和反复思考等重复性思维(RT)方式呈正相关,但它们对幸福感有不同影响,这表明存在重要的维度差异。在研究1中,多维标度法在完成标准RT测量的学生(N = 978)中确定了两个维度——积极与消极内容效价以及探索与解决目的。在研究2中,学生(N = 100)对25种RT描述进行了分类。多维标度法确定了4个维度,包括效价和目的。内容效价与有正负之分的情感相关;解决问题与唤起程度较低的情感以及对思维主题的评价较少两极分化相关。在研究3中,乳腺癌预防试验中的女性(N = 62)对RT描述的效价和目的预测了同时出现的情感以及心理和生理幸福感。