Cancer Center Tec100, Ignacio Zaragoza 263 H16, Col. Centro, Querétaro 76000, QE, Mexico.
Economic Administrative Science Division, University of Guanajuato, Fraccionamiento 1, Col. El Establo S/N, Guanajuato 36250, GJ, Mexico.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Jun 13;21(6):763. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21060763.
(1) Introduction: Cancer diagnosis has been related to depression, anxiety, and distress, as well as to post-traumatic growth (PTG). One of the mediating variables for emotional response is thought style (rumination, cognitive avoidance, and cognitive engagement). (2) Aim: To identify the relationship between thought style and emotional responses to cancer. A secondary aim was to identify the relationship between emotional responses and inflammatory immunological biomarkers. (3) Method: A total of 115 patients with cancer were included in the study. Before initiating cancer treatment, patients were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), distress thermometer, and Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI). Patients provided their most recent blood biometry. (4) Results: Rumination correlated with anxiety, depression, and distress. Cognitive avoidance correlated with PTG (-0.240) and distress (-0.209). Cognitive engagement correlated with PTG (0.393). Regarding thought style and biomarkers, a negative correlation was observed for absolute neutrophils with cognitive avoidance (-0.271) and rumination (0.305). Regarding biomarkers and emotional responses, there was a negative correlation between PTG and absolute lymphocytes (-0.291). There was also a correlation between PTG and neutrophils (0.357) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (0.295). (5) Conclusions: Thought style is related to the emotional response to a cancer diagnosis; rumination is related to depression, distress, and anxiety; and cognitive engagement is related to PTG. PTG is related to inflammation and immunological biomarkers.
(1) 引言:癌症诊断与抑郁、焦虑和困扰有关,也与创伤后成长(PTG)有关。情绪反应的中介变量之一是思维方式(反刍、认知回避和认知参与)。(2) 目的:确定思维方式与癌症患者情绪反应之间的关系。次要目的是确定情绪反应与炎症免疫生物标志物之间的关系。(3) 方法:共有 115 名癌症患者纳入研究。在开始癌症治疗之前,使用医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、痛苦温度计和创伤后成长量表(PTGI)对患者进行评估。患者提供了他们最近的血液生物计量学结果。(4) 结果:反刍与焦虑、抑郁和困扰相关。认知回避与 PTG(-0.240)和痛苦(-0.209)相关。认知参与与 PTG 相关(0.393)。关于思维方式和生物标志物,与认知回避(-0.271)和反刍(0.305)呈负相关。关于生物标志物和情绪反应,PTG 与绝对淋巴细胞呈负相关(-0.291)。PTG 与中性粒细胞(0.357)和中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)(0.295)呈正相关。(5) 结论:思维方式与癌症诊断后的情绪反应有关;反刍与抑郁、困扰和焦虑有关;认知参与与 PTG 有关。PTG 与炎症和免疫生物标志物有关。