• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Experimental, innovative and standard procedures. Ethics and science in the introduction of medical technology].

作者信息

Pons J M V

机构信息

Agència d'Avaluació de Tecnologia i Recerca Mèdiques. Barcelona. España.

出版信息

Gac Sanit. 2003 Sep-Oct;17(5):422-9. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(03)71780-4.

DOI:10.1016/s0213-9111(03)71780-4
PMID:14599427
Abstract

The dividing lines between experimental, innovative and standard medical procedures are frequently blurred in current clinical practice. This is even more true in the fields of surgery and implantable devices. These differ substantially from pharmacological interventions, which are better regulated.However, the character of the various medical interventions applied in human subjects should be ethically and scientifically delimited as clearly as possible. This task cannot be abandoned to personal discretion and criteria, which are currently used, especially in the field of surgical innovation. External and independent review of the risk-benefit ratio of proposed innovations should enable specification of the particular features of a technique in the patient-doctor relationship, as well as the ethical and scientific requirements for more appropriate evaluation.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Experimental, innovative and standard procedures. Ethics and science in the introduction of medical technology].
Gac Sanit. 2003 Sep-Oct;17(5):422-9. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(03)71780-4.
2
Innovative Practice, Clinical Research, and the Ethical Advancement of Medicine.创新实践、临床研究与医学伦理的进步。
Am J Bioeth. 2019 Jun;19(6):7-18. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2019.1602175.
3
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
4
Getting Clearer About Surgical Innovation: A New Definition and a New Tool to Support Responsible Practice.认清手术创新:一个新定义及支持负责任实践的新工具。
Ann Surg. 2015 Dec;262(6):949-54. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001174.
5
An innovative paradigm for clinical research.一种创新的临床研究范式。
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Autumn;3(4):59-61. doi: 10.1162/152651603322614643.
6
Research versus innovation: real differences.研究与创新:真正的差异
Am J Bioeth. 2005 Winter;5(1):42-3; author reply W15-8. doi: 10.1080/15265160590931205.
7
Ethics of innovative surgery: US surgeons' definitions, knowledge, and attitudes.创新手术的伦理:美国外科医生的定义、知识与态度。
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Jan;200(1):103-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.032.
8
Innovation in pediatric surgery: the surgical innovation continuum and the ETHICAL model.小儿外科的创新:手术创新连续体与伦理模型。
J Pediatr Surg. 2014 Apr;49(4):639-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2013.12.016. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
9
Randomized controlled trials of innovative therapies: are they ethical?
J Nephrol. 1995 Nov-Dec;8(6):285-6.
10
Surgical research, an elusive entity.外科研究,一个难以捉摸的实体。
Am J Bioeth. 2003 Autumn;3(4):49-50. doi: 10.1162/152651603322614599.