Ger Luo-Ping, Lee Ming-Chien, Wong Chih-Shung, Chao Shin-Shin, Wang Jhi-Joung, Ho Shung-Tai
Department of Medical Education and Research, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 2003 Sep;41(3):105-14.
Insufficient education and limited clinical practice on the part of physicians may contribute to the undertreatment of cancer pain in Taiwan. To address these concerns, a survey among physicians and fifth-year medical students relevant to cancer pain management (CPM) was carried out in a medical school and its principal teaching hospital.
A questionnaire on CPM was sent to 97 physicians and 78 fifth-year medical students (equivalent to the third-year medical students in the United States). The same questionnaire was delivered again to these 78 fifth-year medical students after they had completed a modified curriculum of anesthesiology with a 4-hour course on introduction to clinical pharmacology of CPM.
The physicians knowledgeable on pain (physicians of anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology), physicians unfamiliar with pain (outside of anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology), and the 5th-yr medical students took similar negative attitudes (24-92%, 33-89%, and 23-94%) toward the optimal use of analgesics for CPM. As compared, the mean score on knowledge of prescribing opioids of pain-knowledgeable physicians was 3.60, the highest of all as against 2.61 of other physicians and 2.54 of 5th-yr medical students. On attitudes toward prescribing opioids, both pain-knowledgeable physicians and other physicians scored a higher means, respectively of 3.52 and 2.91 as opposed to 2.68 of 5th-yr medical students, the lowest of all. However, seniority or length of clinical practice did not improve knowledge or affect attitudes toward CPM. In addition, this 4-hour course did enable the 5th-yr medical students to take a more positive attitude toward and become more knowledgeable on CPM than pain-knowledgeable physicians, as a comparison was made.
The effect of accumulation of clinical experience and seniority of clinical practice on CPM was limited among general physicians, except for clinical specialty on anesthesiology, hematology-oncology, or radiation oncology. In Taiwan, the knowledge of and positive attitude toward CPM could only be conveyed to physicians through undergraduate, post graduate or on-job education.
台湾地区医生教育不足以及临床实践有限,可能导致癌症疼痛治疗不足。为解决这些问题,在一所医学院及其主要教学医院对医生和五年级医学生开展了一项与癌症疼痛管理(CPM)相关的调查。
向97名医生和78名五年级医学生(相当于美国的三年级医学生)发放了一份关于CPM的问卷。在这78名五年级医学生完成了一门经过修改的麻醉学课程以及一门4小时的CPM临床药理学入门课程后,再次向他们发放了相同的问卷。
熟悉疼痛的医生(麻醉学、血液肿瘤学或放射肿瘤学医生)、不熟悉疼痛的医生(非麻醉学、血液肿瘤学或放射肿瘤学医生)以及五年级医学生对CPM中最佳使用镇痛药持相似的消极态度(分别为24% - 92%、33% - 89%和23% - 94%)。相比之下,熟悉疼痛的医生在开具阿片类药物知识方面的平均得分为3.60,是所有人中最高的,而其他医生为2.61,五年级医学生为2.54。在开具阿片类药物的态度方面,熟悉疼痛的医生和其他医生的平均分分别更高,为3.52和2.91,而五年级医学生为2.68,是所有人中最低的。然而,资历或临床实践时长并未提高对CPM的知识水平或影响态度。此外,与熟悉疼痛的医生相比,这门4小时的课程确实使五年级医学生对CPM采取了更积极的态度并对其有了更多了解。
除麻醉学、血液肿瘤学或放射肿瘤学等临床专科外,临床经验积累和临床实践资历对普通医生的CPM影响有限。在台湾地区,只有通过本科、研究生或在职教育才能将CPM知识和积极态度传授给医生。