• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索医学生疼痛医学能力评估——综述

Exploring assessment of medical students' competencies in pain medicine-A review.

作者信息

Shipton Elspeth Erica, Steketee Carole, Bate Frank, Visser Eric John

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle WA, Australia.

The Learning and Teaching Office, University of Notre Dame Australia, Fremantle WA, Australia.

出版信息

Pain Rep. 2018 Dec 12;4(1):e704. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000704. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.

DOI:10.1097/PR9.0000000000000704
PMID:30801044
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6370140/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Considering the continuing high prevalence and public health burden of pain, it is critical that medical students are equipped with competencies in the field of pain medicine. Robust assessment of student expertise is integral for effective implementation of competency-based medical education.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this review was to describe the literature regarding methods for assessing pain medicine competencies in medical students.

METHOD

PubMed, Medline, EMBASE, ERIC, and Google Scholar, and BEME data bases were searched for empirical studies primarily focusing on assessment of any domain of pain medicine competencies in medical students published between January 1997 and December 2016.

RESULTS

A total of 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. Most assessments were performed for low-stakes summative purposes and did not reflect contemporary theories of assessment. Assessments were predominantly undertaken using written tests or clinical simulation methods. The most common pain medicine education topics assessed were pain pharmacology and the management of cancer and low-back pain. Most studies focussed on assessment of cognitive levels of learning as opposed to more challenging domains of demonstrating skills and attitudes or developing and implementing pain management plans.

CONCLUSION

This review highlights the need for more robust assessment tools that effectively measure the abilities of medical students to integrate pain-related competencies into clinical practice. A Pain Medicine Assessment Framework has been developed to encourage systematic planning of pain medicine assessment at medical schools internationally and to promote continuous multidimensional assessments in a variety of clinical contexts based on well-defined pain medicine competencies.

摘要

引言

鉴于疼痛的高患病率和公共卫生负担持续存在,医学生具备疼痛医学领域的能力至关重要。对学生专业知识进行有力评估是有效实施基于能力的医学教育的不可或缺的部分。

目的

本综述的目的是描述有关评估医学生疼痛医学能力的方法的文献。

方法

检索了PubMed、Medline、EMBASE、ERIC、谷歌学术以及BEME数据库,以查找主要关注1997年1月至2016年12月期间发表的评估医学生疼痛医学能力任何领域的实证研究。

结果

共有41项研究符合纳入标准。大多数评估是出于低风险的总结性目的进行的,并未反映当代评估理论。评估主要采用书面测试或临床模拟方法进行。评估的最常见的疼痛医学教育主题是疼痛药理学以及癌症和腰痛的管理。大多数研究侧重于评估认知学习水平,而不是更具挑战性的展示技能和态度或制定和实施疼痛管理计划的领域。

结论

本综述强调需要更强大的评估工具,以有效衡量医学生将疼痛相关能力整合到临床实践中的能力。已制定了一个疼痛医学评估框架,以鼓励国际上各医学院校系统规划疼痛医学评估,并促进基于明确的疼痛医学能力在各种临床环境中进行持续的多维度评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe3/6370140/86a380c03678/painreports-4-e704-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe3/6370140/f13dbd96ed66/painreports-4-e704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe3/6370140/86a380c03678/painreports-4-e704-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe3/6370140/f13dbd96ed66/painreports-4-e704-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3fe3/6370140/86a380c03678/painreports-4-e704-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring assessment of medical students' competencies in pain medicine-A review.探索医学生疼痛医学能力评估——综述
Pain Rep. 2018 Dec 12;4(1):e704. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000000704. eCollection 2019 Jan-Feb.
2
Systematic Review of Pain Medicine Content, Teaching, and Assessment in Medical School Curricula Internationally.国际医学院校课程中疼痛医学内容、教学与评估的系统评价
Pain Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):139-161. doi: 10.1007/s40122-018-0103-z. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
3
The educational effects of portfolios on undergraduate student learning: a Best Evidence Medical Education (BEME) systematic review. BEME Guide No. 11.档案袋对本科学生学习的教育效果:最佳证据医学教育(BEME)系统评价。BEME指南第11号。
Med Teach. 2009 Apr;31(4):282-98. doi: 10.1080/01421590902889897.
4
Approaches for defining and assessing nursing informatics competencies: a scoping review.定义和评估护理信息学能力的方法:范围综述。
JBI Evid Synth. 2021 Apr;19(4):794-841. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00100.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Implementing goals for non-cognitive outcomes within a basic science course.在基础科学课程中实现非认知成果目标。
Acad Med. 2002 Sep;77(9):931-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00035.
7
Measuring medical students' professional competencies in a problem-based curriculum: a reliability study.基于问题的课程中测量医学生专业能力:一项可靠性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 May 21;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1594-y.
8
Assessment of clinical competence in competency-based education.基于能力的医学教育中临床能力的评估。
Can J Dent Hyg. 2020 Jun 1;54(2):83-91.
9
Methods to assess students' acquisition, application and integration of basic science knowledge in an innovative competency-based curriculum.在基于创新能力的课程中评估学生对基础科学知识的掌握、应用和整合的方法。
Med Teach. 2008;30(7):e171-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590802139740.
10
Learning and assessment strategies to develop specific and transversal competencies for a humanized medical education.培养人性化医学教育中特定和横向能力的学习与评估策略。
Front Physiol. 2023 Jul 10;14:1212031. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1212031. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Cornea specialists are the highest opioid prescribers at a large academic eye institute in the USA.在美国一家大型学术眼科机构中,角膜专科医生是阿片类药物处方量最高的医生。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar 3;10(1):e002012. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-002012.
2
Assessment of opioid knowledge and attitudes among senior medical students in Taiwan's pain education curriculum: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey.台湾疼痛教育课程中高年级医学生阿片类药物知识和态度评估:一项横断面问卷调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Sep 27;24(1):1045. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06043-4.
3
Interprofessional Active Learning for Chronic Pain: Transforming Student Learning From Recall to Application.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic Review of Pain Medicine Content, Teaching, and Assessment in Medical School Curricula Internationally.国际医学院校课程中疼痛医学内容、教学与评估的系统评价
Pain Ther. 2018 Dec;7(2):139-161. doi: 10.1007/s40122-018-0103-z. Epub 2018 Jul 30.
2
Pain medicine content, teaching and assessment in medical school curricula in Australia and New Zealand.澳大利亚和新西兰医学院课程中的疼痛医学内容、教学和评估。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 May 11;18(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1204-4.
3
Incorporating patient partner scores into high stakes assessment: an observational study into opinions and attitudes.
慢性疼痛的跨专业主动学习:将学生学习从记忆转化为应用。
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2023 Dec 25;10:23821205231221950. doi: 10.1177/23821205231221950. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
The Pain Medicine Curriculum Framework-structured integration of pain medicine education into the medical curriculum.疼痛医学课程框架——将疼痛医学教育结构化整合到医学课程中。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2023 Jan 9;3:1057114. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2022.1057114. eCollection 2022.
5
"Ten-year mixed method evaluation of prelicensure health professional student self-reported learning in an interfaculty pain curriculum": a view on pain education.“对预执业健康专业学生在跨学院疼痛课程中自我报告学习情况的十年混合方法评估”:关于疼痛教育的观点
Pain Rep. 2022 Sep 14;7(5):e1031. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001031. eCollection 2022 Sep-Oct.
6
[The cross-sectional field "pain medicine" in medical studies at the University of Leipzig-What has been achieved? : An analysis of self-estimation of students before, during and 5 years after establishment of the cross-sectional field].[莱比锡大学医学研究中的“疼痛医学”横断面领域——取得了哪些成果?:对该横断面领域设立前、设立期间及设立5年后学生自我评估的分析]
Schmerz. 2022 Dec;36(6):389-397. doi: 10.1007/s00482-022-00665-7. Epub 2022 Aug 26.
7
Neuropathic pain in Mali: The current situation, comprehensive hypothesis, which therapeutic strategy for Africa?马里的神经性疼痛:现状、综合假说及非洲的治疗策略是什么?
eNeurologicalSci. 2021 Jan 9;22:100312. doi: 10.1016/j.ensci.2021.100312. eCollection 2021 Mar.
8
Project OPUS: Development and evaluation of an electronic platform for pain management education of medical undergraduates in resource-limited settings.OPUS 项目:为资源有限环境下的医学本科生开发和评估一个电子平台,以进行疼痛管理教育。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 10;15(12):e0243573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243573. eCollection 2020.
将患者伙伴评分纳入高风险评估:关于意见和态度的观察性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Nov 15;17(1):214. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1063-4.
4
From aggregation to interpretation: how assessors judge complex data in a competency-based portfolio.从聚集到解释:评估者如何在基于能力的组合中判断复杂数据。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2018 May;23(2):275-287. doi: 10.1007/s10459-017-9793-y. Epub 2017 Oct 14.
5
Peer Evaluation Instrument Development, Administration, and Assessment in a Team-based Learning Curriculum.基于团队学习课程的同伴评价工具开发、管理与评估
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):68. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81468.
6
Core principles of assessment in competency-based medical education.基于能力的医学教育评估的核心原则。
Med Teach. 2017 Jun;39(6):609-616. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1315082.
7
Chronic pain management in medical education: a disastrous omission.医学教育中的慢性疼痛管理:一个灾难性的疏忽。
Postgrad Med. 2017 Apr;129(3):332-335. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1297668. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
8
Responsible, Safe, and Effective Prescription of Opioids for Chronic Non-Cancer Pain: American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP) Guidelines.慢性非癌性疼痛阿片类药物的合理、安全与有效处方:美国介入性疼痛医师协会(ASIPP)指南
Pain Physician. 2017 Feb;20(2S):S3-S92.
9
Do coursework summative assessments predict clinical performance? A systematic review.课程总结性评估能否预测临床能力?一项系统评价。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Feb 16;17(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0878-3.
10
Driving Needed Change in Pain Education.推动疼痛教育所需的变革。
Pain Med. 2016 Oct;17(10):1790-1792. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnw216. Epub 2016 Aug 24.