Suppr超能文献

DNA数据库搜索争议中的证据价值与双样本问题。

The evidential value in the DNA database search controversy and the two-stain problem.

作者信息

Meester Ronald, Sjerps Marjan

机构信息

Divisie Wiskunde, Faculteit der Exacte Wetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2003 Sep;59(3):727-32. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00084.

Abstract

Does the evidential strength of a DNA match depend on whether the suspect was identified through database search or through other evidence ("probable cause")? In Balding and Donnelly (1995, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 158, 21-53) and elsewhere, it has been argued that the evidential strength is slightly larger in a database search case than in a probable cause case, while Stockmarr (1999, Biometrics 55, 671-677) reached the opposite conclusion. Both these approaches use likelihood ratios. By making an excursion to a similar problem, the two-stain problem, we argue in this article that there are certain fundamental difficulties with the use of a likelihood ratio, which can be avoided by concentrating on the posterior odds. This approach helps resolving the above-mentioned conflict.

摘要

DNA比对的证据强度是否取决于嫌疑人是通过数据库搜索还是通过其他证据(“合理依据”)识别出来的?在鲍尔丁和唐纳利(1995年,《皇家统计学会杂志》,A辑158卷,21 - 53页)以及其他地方,有人认为在数据库搜索的情况下证据强度比在合理依据的情况下略大,而斯托克马尔(1999年,《生物统计学》55卷,671 - 677页)得出了相反的结论。这两种方法都使用似然比。通过探讨一个类似的问题,即双样本问题,我们在本文中认为使用似然比存在某些基本困难,而通过关注后验概率可以避免这些困难。这种方法有助于解决上述冲突。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验