Meester Ronald, Sjerps Marjan
Divisie Wiskunde, Faculteit der Exacte Wetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Biometrics. 2003 Sep;59(3):727-32. doi: 10.1111/1541-0420.00084.
Does the evidential strength of a DNA match depend on whether the suspect was identified through database search or through other evidence ("probable cause")? In Balding and Donnelly (1995, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A 158, 21-53) and elsewhere, it has been argued that the evidential strength is slightly larger in a database search case than in a probable cause case, while Stockmarr (1999, Biometrics 55, 671-677) reached the opposite conclusion. Both these approaches use likelihood ratios. By making an excursion to a similar problem, the two-stain problem, we argue in this article that there are certain fundamental difficulties with the use of a likelihood ratio, which can be avoided by concentrating on the posterior odds. This approach helps resolving the above-mentioned conflict.
DNA比对的证据强度是否取决于嫌疑人是通过数据库搜索还是通过其他证据(“合理依据”)识别出来的?在鲍尔丁和唐纳利(1995年,《皇家统计学会杂志》,A辑158卷,21 - 53页)以及其他地方,有人认为在数据库搜索的情况下证据强度比在合理依据的情况下略大,而斯托克马尔(1999年,《生物统计学》55卷,671 - 677页)得出了相反的结论。这两种方法都使用似然比。通过探讨一个类似的问题,即双样本问题,我们在本文中认为使用似然比存在某些基本困难,而通过关注后验概率可以避免这些困难。这种方法有助于解决上述冲突。