Davis Daniel H J
College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, The University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, Scotland EH8 9 AG, UK.
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jan;58(2):369-78. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(03)00202-8.
This analysis presents a challenge to the biomedical view of dementia as a disease. This view is critiqued from two perspectives: those of sociology and philosophy. Because these domains inform the creation of the medical discourse, their analysis provides an important refinement to the apprehension of the phenomenon of dementia. From the work of Foucault, and in particular his analysis of the historical origins of modern medicine, the sociological construction of dementia is considered. Following this, the philosophical question of Being is discussed, considering particularly the positions of Heidegger and Merleau-Ponty. Lastly aspects of dementia nursing that are damaging to those relatives forced to take on the role of primary carer are isolated, in the context of Kitwood's view that it is possible to maintain personhood at the extremes of this condition. It is suggested that this critique of sociological and philosophical foundations of dementia might offer a way of approaching the dismantling of the self and revise current conceptions of dementia care for the better.
这一分析对将痴呆视为一种疾病的生物医学观点提出了挑战。这一观点从社会学和哲学两个视角受到了批判。由于这些领域为医学话语的形成提供了依据,它们的分析为理解痴呆现象提供了重要的细化。从福柯的著作,尤其是他对现代医学历史起源的分析出发,探讨了痴呆的社会学建构。在此之后,讨论了存在的哲学问题,特别考虑了海德格尔和梅洛 - 庞蒂的观点。最后,在基特伍德认为在这种情况的极端状态下仍有可能保持人格的观点背景下,找出了痴呆护理中对那些被迫承担主要照顾者角色的亲属造成伤害的方面。有人认为,对痴呆的社会学和哲学基础的这种批判可能提供一种方式,来着手拆解自我并更好地修正当前的痴呆护理观念。